Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update

Biblical Living Unlocked

Logo - Biblical living unlocked
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Biblical Parenting
    • Parenting Tips
    • Family Fellowship
    • Bible Teaching
    • Apologetics
    • Community Stories
    • Youth Focus
    • International
    • Walton Evangelical Church
    • Salt Church Mar Menor
    • Salt Church Los Montesinos
    • John Piper
    • News & Offers
Add Element
  • Ken on Facebook
    update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
4 Minutes Read

This Is How The Cross Works



Why Did Jesus Die? Understanding Isaiah 53 and the Meaning of the Cross

Introduction: A Big Question

Many people today, even some in the church, are questioning or denying what the Bible teaches about Jesus’ death on the cross. Some even say that the idea of Jesus taking the punishment for our sins is wrong or harmful.

But what does the Bible actually say? In this article, we’ll look at one very important part of the Bible—Isaiah 53—to help us understand why Jesus died and what it means for us.

What Is Penal Substitution?

Penal substitution is a big phrase, but the idea is simple:

• Penal means to do with punishment.

• Substitution means someone taking someone else’s place.

So, penal substitution means Jesus took the punishment that we deserve for our sins. He suffered and died instead of us.

This idea isn’t just something people made up—it comes straight from the Bible. And Isaiah 53 is one of the clearest places that shows it.

Where Do We Find This in the Bible?

The Servant in Isaiah

Isaiah was a prophet who lived hundreds of years before Jesus. God gave him messages about a special person called the “servant.” This servant would come to help God’s people, not just Israel, but many nations.

Isaiah 53 tells us that this servant would suffer. He would be rejected, hurt, and even killed. But it also tells us why.

Start from Isaiah 52:13

This section begins in Isaiah 52:13 and goes all the way to the end of chapter 53. It’s one big message about the servant. Christians believe this is all about Jesus.

What Does Isaiah 53 Say?

1. He Was Rejected and Hurt

“He was despised and rejected by men, a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief…” —Isaiah 53:3

Jesus didn’t come as a rich or powerful man. He was rejected and suffered greatly.

2. He Carried Our Pain

“Surely he has borne our griefs and carried our sorrows…”

—Isaiah 53:4

The servant took on our pain and sadness. He didn’t just suffer—he suffered for us.

3. He Was Punished in Our Place

“But he was pierced for our transgressions; he was crushed for our iniquities…” —Isaiah 53:5

Jesus didn’t die for his own sins—he had none. He was punished because of our sins. The Bible uses words like “pierced,” “crushed,” and “chastised.” These are strong words that show real pain and punishment.

4. God Planned It

“It was the will of the Lord to crush him; he has put him to grief…” —Isaiah 53:10

This was not an accident or mistake. God planned for Jesus to suffer and die for our sins. This doesn’t mean God is cruel—it means God is just and loving. He found a way to deal with sin and still forgive sinners.

5. He Was a Guilt Offering

“When his soul makes an offering for guilt…” —Isaiah 53:10

In the Old Testament, people would offer animals to God to show they were sorry for their sins. The animal took their place. Isaiah says Jesus became that kind of offering. He is the perfect sacrifice for sin.

6. He Bore Our Sin

“The Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all.” —Isaiah 53:6

“Iniquity” is another word for sin. God put our sin on Jesus. Three times in Isaiah 53 it says the servant “bore” or “carried” our sin. This is like the Old Testament sacrifices where a lamb would carry the people’s sin.

7. He Was Innocent

“Although he had done no violence, and there was no deceit in his mouth.” —Isaiah 53:9

Jesus was completely innocent. He had never sinned. But he still suffered and died. That’s what makes this such a powerful act of love—he didn’t deserve it, but he did it for us.

8. He Made Us Right With God

“By his knowledge shall the righteous one, my servant, make many to be accounted righteous…” —Isaiah 53:11

Because of Jesus, we can be made right with God. We don’t earn it. It’s a gift. Jesus took our sin and gave us his goodness. This is what Christians call imputation—God counts us as righteous because of Jesus.

But Isn’t This “Cosmic Child Abuse”?

Some people say that this teaching sounds like abuse—that God the Father punished his own Son. But that’s not what the Bible says.

Jesus willingly gave his life (John 10:18). The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit all worked together in love to save us. It wasn’t cruel—it was the greatest act of love in history.

What About Other Views?

There are other ways people talk about what Jesus did on the cross:

• Moral example – Jesus shows us how to love.

• Victory over evil – Jesus beats sin and death.

These are true, but they aren’t the whole story. If we take away penal substitution, we miss the heart of the gospel. Jesus didn’t just show us love—he saved us from sin by taking our place.

The Good News of the Cross

Isaiah 53 shows us that Jesus is the suffering servant who died for our sins. He was pierced, crushed, and rejected so that we could be healed, forgiven, and accepted.

This isn’t a scary or ugly idea. It’s a beautiful truth. It shows how much God loves us—that he would give his own Son to take our place and bring us back to him.

“All we like sheep have gone astray… and the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all.” —Isaiah 53:6

Conclusion: What Should We Do?

• Read Isaiah 53 carefully.

• Remember what Jesus did for you.

• Trust in him to forgive your sins.

• Tell others the good news.



Jesus took your place so you could take his. That’s the heart of the gospel. That’s the meaning of the cross.






Apologetics

18 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
12.12.2025

Is Christmas Pagan? Delve into the Origins of Christmas vs. Kaaba

Update Decoding the Origins of Christmas: A Celebration of Faith or a Pagan Myth? The debate surrounding the origins of Christmas often sparks animated discussions among believers and skeptics alike. For many, the notion that Christmas festivities are rooted in pagan traditions raises eyebrows and questions of faith. However, the recent dialogue featured in the video titled Christmas or the Kaaba: Which is More Pagan? led by Mike Jones of Inspiring Philosophy offers a refreshing perspective on these traditions. Within this discussion, we delve into the claims and the historical context surrounding Christmas and its connection—or lack thereof—to pagan origins.In the video Christmas or the Kaaba: Which Is More Pagan?, the discussion dives into the origins of Christmas traditions and their potential pagan connections, which has sparked deeper analysis on our end. Tracing the Historical Roots of Christmas One of the integral arguments presented is that Christmas is not a recreation of pagan rituals, but rather a holiday rooted in Christian significance. The date of December 25th is suggested to align with the early Christian belief that Jesus’ conception occurred on March 25th, leading to the nine-month period culminating in December. This assertion dismantles the claim that Christmas simply appropriated customs from existing pagan festivities. Moreover, references to supposed pagan festivals such as Saturnalia or the sun festival, Sol Invictus, fail to hold up against historical scrutiny. Evidence reveals that these celebrations did not extend to December 25th prior to Christianity's rise. Instead, it could be argued that once Christianity ascended, pagans adapted by creating their own celebrations on the same date, not the other way around. This narrative aligns with the Christian tradition as a deeply rooted celebration of faith, juxtaposed against the shadow of antiquated beliefs. Christmas Traditions: Misconceptions or Cultural Adaptations? Further insights into popular Christmas symbols and traditions debunk their alleged pagan links. For instance, the Christmas tree—a centerpiece in modern celebrations—stems from a uniquely Christian source. Documentation points to its emergence in 15th century Germany linked with the feast day of Adam and Eve, rather than ancient pagan practices. The evolution of Santa Claus from St. Nicholas also exemplifies transformation rather than imitation. With Dutch immigrants in the early 1800s revamping the saint into a secular figure, the narrative of Santa became distinctively Christian in character. Thus, one can argue that rather than being pagan, Christmas hopefuls celebrate a rich tapestry of lore embellished by cultural evolution over time. Unpacking the Kaaba: A Site of Complex Significance Shifting the focus to the Kaaba in Mecca, the discourse brings forth the question of its origins. Historically tied to the worship practices of pre-Islamic Arabian tribes, the Kaaba is depicted as a site once filled with idols. Intriguingly, the dialogue explores how Islam transformed its meaning but raises questions about the persistence of pagan elements within Islamic rituals. The Hajj pilgrimage, which includes circumambulating the Kaaba, evokes imagery of ancient rites practiced by pagans, suggesting a complex relationship between Islam and its historical precursor practices. For the faithful, this leads to contemplation of how much of their religious expression echoes back to ancient customs. Faithful Reflections: The Intersection of Tradition and Modern Belief The contrasting views on Christmas and its roots versus the Kaaba’s practices ultimately invite believers to reflect on the integrity of their traditions. Engaging in these discussions encourages not only a greater understanding of one’s faith but fostering open dialogues among diverse religious backgrounds. The complexities behind these traditions highlight the necessity to critically explore how beliefs are shaped through narratives that span time and culture. Encouragement for a Deeper Dive into Faith As members of faith communities or those exploring spiritual paths, understanding the origins and implications of religious practices enriches our appreciation for beliefs and traditions. This reflective journey often pulls us towards seeking deeper connections to our faith, prompting questions that lead to knowledge discovery and greater understanding. For those seeking unique gifts this season that resonate with the spirit of Christmas while upholding traditions, consider exploring gifts from organizations like Artsa. Their handmade offerings celebrate the rich heritage and stories from the Holy Land, emphasizing the importance of giving meaningful gifts that reflect one’s own faith journey.

12.11.2025

Navigating Faith and Atheism: Insights from 'aThEiSt dEsTroYS cHRiStiAn!'

Update The Clash of Worldviews: A Look into Secular and Christian Perspectives In an increasingly polarized world, discussions that highlight the stark differences between secular and religious beliefs often lead to heated debates. The video, "aThEiSt dEsTroYS cHRiStiAn!" depicts a confrontation that underscores this tension. While it might depict a moment of anger and dismissal, it also opens a door to a more significant conversation about how these differing perspectives shape our societies.In 'aThEiSt dEsTroYS cHRiStiAn!', the topic of faith and atheism emerges, provoking deeper insights into the landscape of belief and understanding. Biblical Foundations: What Scripture Says About Disagreement As Christians, we are often called to engage with the world around us, even when faced with oppositional views. Romans 12:18 advises us, "If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone." This suggests that while disagreements may arise, our response should be rooted in peace and understanding. Drawing on the fruits of the Spirit such as patience and kindness can help us navigate these encounters effectively. Historical Context of Faith and Secularism The roots of the conflict between religious and secular worldviews can be traced back through history. The Enlightenment era was pivotal; it heralded a period where reason began to take precedence over faith for many. This era birthed modern secularism, leading to the questioning of traditional beliefs. Understanding this history helps frame the present-day debates and conflicts seen in society, diving deeper into why they occur and how they can be constructively engaged. Emotional Responses: Understanding the Stakes Many Christians might feel attacked or belittled when confronted with dismissive rhetoric from atheists. Emotions run high during discussions about faith as they directly touch upon deeply held beliefs and values. Recognizing these feelings and approaching them with empathy can foster more fruitful discussions rather than combative encounters. Rethinking Apologetics: Responding with Grace The art of apologetics, or defending the faith, becomes crucial in engagements like those portrayed in the video. It's not merely about winning an argument but offering reasons for our hope and convictions with gentleness and respect (1 Peter 3:15). Understanding how to present our beliefs calmly and clearly can make a difference in how our message is received. Building Bridges: Finding Common Ground One approach to resolving tension between Christians and atheists is seeking common ground. Issues like morality, community, and purpose resonate on both sides, albeit from different vantage points. By focusing on shared values—such as the importance of community or the pursuit of truth—Christians can engage in more meaningful dialogues, which may ultimately lead to better understanding. Actions You Can Take: Engaging Compassionately In light of these discussions, it is essential for individuals and church communities to engage in outreach that embodies the grace and truth of the Gospel. Here are some actionable insights: Education: Organize workshops on how to dialogue about faith and secularism constructively. Listen: Prioritize listening over responding to understand the concerns of atheists and secularists fully. Community Service: Engage in community service projects that exhibit Christ’s love in action, bridging gaps between differing worldviews. A Final Thought: Seeking Unity in Diversity As we navigate these tensions presented in "aThEiSt dEsTroYS cHRiStiAn!", it becomes imperative for us as Christians to remember our calling to be light in the world (Matthew 5:14). Rather than retaliating, let our goal be understanding, compassion, and engagement that leads to healing and hope, paving the way toward constructive dialogue in a divided society. For those interested in further exploration of apologetics or how to strengthen your moral foundations based on biblical teachings, consider connecting with local churches or study groups aimed at fostering discussions that bridge these divides.

12.10.2025

Mormonism Examined: Is It Truly a Branch of Christianity?

Update The Intricacies of Mormonism: A Unique Perspective on Christianity Mormonism often raises eyebrows when it comes to its classification within Christianity. For many believers, the central question remains: Is Mormonism genuinely a part of the historic Christian movement, or does it espouse beliefs that deviate significantly from traditional Christian doctrine? This exploration, sparked by discussions surrounding the teachings and beliefs of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS), unravels a complex tapestry of faith where definitions, doctrines, and interpretations diverge from conventional Christianity.In the discussion prompted by 'Mormonism Examined: Jesus, God, Salvation, and More,' we delve into the complexities of Mormon claims to Christianity and their theological implications. Understanding the Roots of Mormon Belief The roots of Mormonism can be traced back to the early 1800s with the claims of Joseph Smith, often referred to as the founder of the faith. At the heart of LDS theology is the concept of the First Vision—a divine revelation that purportedly explains the need for a modern restoration of Christianity. Joseph Smith’s narrative posits that all existing Christian denominations were corrupt and that he received a command from God to establish a new church. This foundational story raises critical questions regarding its historical and theological accuracy, challenging the accepted tenets of historic Christianity, which affirm the idea of a singular truth in Christ. The Nature of Christ and God: Doctrinal Divergences Significant differences emerge when examining the LDS understanding of Jesus Christ and God in comparison to traditional Christian beliefs. According to LDS doctrine, Jesus is viewed as a spirit brother to all humanity, including Lucifer, which stands in stark contrast to the historic Christian belief in Jesus as the eternal Son of God, uncreated and distinct within the Trinity. This results in theological implications that fundamentally alter the conception of salvation and the nature of God, where God is seen as having once been a man, thus fundamentally changing the character of God in Mormon thought versus traditional Christian theology. The Role of Grace and Works within Salvation Another essential area of divergence is in the doctrine of salvation itself. In traditional Christianity, salvation is understood as a gift from God, achieved through faith in Jesus Christ and His atoning sacrifice, emphasizing grace over works. In contrast, Mormonism teaches a synergistic approach to salvation where a believer must both accept grace and demonstrate righteousness through works, thereby creating an ongoing tension between faith and obedience. This belief implicates an uncertain assurance of salvation among committed Latter-day Saints, contributing to anxiety about whether they have fulfilled the requirements necessary to achieve exaltation in the afterlife. This differs markedly from the assurance that many Christians derive from faith in Christ’s completed work on the cross. The Relevance of Personal Revelation In recent discussions, the concept of personal revelation has become increasingly accentuated within the LDS community, leading to a complex relationship with their established doctrines. While the church teaches that its leaders are divinely inspired and authoritative, there exists a growing trend among many Latter-day Saints who lean towards individual interpretations of faith, sometimes redefining traditional doctrines based on personal experiences rather than established church teachings. This shift poses a challenge not just for the church's cohesion but also complicates dialogue between Christians and members of the LDS faith. A Call to Understanding and Dialogue Engaging in respectful and informed conversations about Mormonism allows believers from both faith backgrounds to navigate the complexities of belief together. Understanding the nuances and intricacies within LDS theology can facilitate meaningful dialogue, fostering mutual respect and insight into the varying ways individuals seek to understand God, salvation, and their faith. Whether you are a believer seeking to strengthen your faith or a seeker exploring different viewpoints, taking the time to discuss and explore these differences can enrich your understanding of both Christianity and Mormonism. Conclusion: Seeking Common Ground In exploring whether Mormonism is part of the historic Christian movement, it is crucial to engage thoughtfully with the underlying doctrines and beliefs that shape this conversation. As both sides navigate their theological landscapes, there lies an opportunity for deeper understanding. It remains vital for individuals, whether they identify as Catholic, Orthodox, or Protestant, to approach conversations about faith with grace and love, acknowledging where differences exist while also finding common ground in the quest for truth.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*