Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update

Biblical Living Unlocked

Logo - Biblical living unlocked
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Biblical Parenting
    • Parenting Tips
    • Family Fellowship
    • Bible Teaching
    • Apologetics
    • Community Stories
    • Youth Focus
    • International
    • Walton Evangelical Church
    • Salt Church Mar Menor
    • Salt Church Los Montesinos
    • John Piper
    • News & Offers
Add Element
  • Ken on Facebook
    update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
4 Minutes Read

They Are Trying to Shame Us out of Good Theology by Misrepresenting Penal Substitution



Why Did Jesus Die? Understanding the Cross and God’s Love

Introduction

The Bible teaches that Jesus died for our sins. But some people today are mocking or misunderstanding what that means. Pastor Mike Winger explains why Jesus died on the cross, what it really shows us about God, and why some popular ideas about it are wrong. Let’s take a closer look at what the Bible says and why it matters.

What Is Penal Substitution?

Jesus Took Our Place

The word “penal” comes from the idea of punishment. “Substitution” means someone taking someone else’s place. So “penal substitution” means Jesus was punished in our place. He took the punishment we deserve for our sin.

Romans 5:8 says,

“But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.”

This doesn’t mean God was angry and needed to hurt someone. It means Jesus willingly took our punishment so that we could be forgiven and become friends with God.

Common Misunderstandings

Is God Violent and Angry?

Some people wrongly say that penal substitution teaches that God is mean or bloodthirsty. They say things like, “Would a loving God really kill his own son?”

But this is not what Christians believe. The Bible shows that:

• Jesus chose to die. He wasn’t forced. (John 10:18)

• Jesus is God the Son. He and the Father are one. (John 10:30)

• God is both just and loving. (Romans 3:26)

So the cross is not about God losing his temper. It’s about his perfect justice and love meeting in one amazing act.

Is It Like Pagan Sacrifices?

No, It’s Completely Different

Some critics say that penal substitution is like ancient pagan sacrifices, where people killed animals or even humans to make angry gods happy.

But the Bible teaches the opposite:

1. Jesus is our true representative – He stood in for all of us. (Romans 5:19)

2. It’s about justice, not cruelty – God must deal with sin fairly. (Deuteronomy 32:4)

3. Jesus bore our sin willingly – He gave himself. (Galatians 2:20)

4. God gave the sacrifice – God provided what we could never offer. (John 3:16)

So the cross is not a copy of pagan ideas. It’s the complete answer to sin that only God could give.

Did God Pour Out His Wrath on Jesus?

Understanding God’s Holy Anger

The Bible speaks about God’s “wrath” – this means his holy anger against sin. It’s not a selfish rage but a right response to evil.

Romans 5:9 says,

“Since we have now been justified by his blood, how much more shall we be saved from God’s wrath through him!”

Jesus suffered the punishment we deserve. That’s why we can now be saved from God’s wrath and welcomed as his children.

Jesus Reveals God’s Love and Justice

Not One or the Other – Both Together

Some say the cross only shows God’s love, not his justice. Others think it’s only about punishment. But the Bible teaches both.

At the cross:

• God shows his love by sending his Son. (John 3:16)

• God shows his justice by punishing sin. (Isaiah 53:5)

Jesus didn’t save us from a bad, angry God. He is God, and he came to save us from sin and its consequences.

Is the Father Against the Son?

No – They Are United

Some critics say penal substitution divides the Trinity – like the Father punishing the Son while the Son tries to protect us.

But Jesus said: “Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father.” (John 14:9)

The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit work together in perfect unity. The Father sends the Son. The Son obeys willingly. The Spirit helps us believe and understand. (Romans 8:11)

Why Couldn’t God Just Forgive Us?

God Is Just and Loving

Some ask, “Why didn’t God just forgive us without Jesus dying?”

The answer is: Because God is just. He can’t pretend sin doesn’t matter. But because God is love, he made a way to forgive us—by taking the punishment himself.

Romans 3:26 says, “He did this to demonstrate his righteousness… so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus.”

The Parable of the Prodigal Son

Doesn’t That Show Forgiveness Without Punishment?

Some people use Jesus’ parable of the prodigal son (Luke 15:11–32) to say that God doesn’t need to punish sin to forgive us.

But that story isn’t about the whole message of the cross. It shows that God is eager to welcome us when we return. But Jesus still had to make that return possible through his death.

God’s Wrath and God’s Love Are Not Opposites

They Go Together at the Cross

Critics often ask, “Is God loving or punishing?” But that’s a false choice. God is both loving and just. That’s why the cross is so powerful.

1 Thessalonians 1:10 says, “Jesus, who rescues us from the coming wrath.”

Jesus saves us from the judgment we deserve, by taking it himself. That is perfect love.

Conclusion

The cross of Jesus is not a picture of cruelty—it’s a picture of God’s amazing love and justice. Jesus wasn’t a helpless victim. He chose to die for us. God didn’t hurt an innocent stranger. He gave himself to save us.

Let’s not be ashamed of the cross, even when people mock it. The Bible tells us clearly:

“The message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.” (1 Corinthians 1:18)

Jesus died so that we could live. That’s the heart of the gospel.

Key Bible References

• Romans 5:8–9

• John 3:16

• Isaiah 53:5

• Romans 3:26

• Galatians 2:20

• 1 Thessalonians 1:10

• 1 Corinthians 1:18

• John 10:18

• John 14:9

• Luke 15:11–32








Apologetics

16 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
01.14.2026

Exploring the Meaning of 'Charlie Kirk' in Cultural Discourse

Update Understanding the Phrase “Charlie Kirk” in Today’s Context In recent discussions, particularly among the youth and those engaging in cultural critiques, the phrase “to Charlie Kirk” has emerged as a phrase that raises eyebrows. What does it mean, and why has it become a topic of interest? The term references Charlie Kirk, known for his vocal conservative views, particularly in connection with the intersections of faith and politics in modern America. Context is key here; when someone mentions “they want to Charlie Kirk me,” they are often indicating a desire for confrontation or a deep ideological engagement.In 'They're Going to Charlie Kirk Me! What's That Mean?', the discussion explores the implications of the phrase, sparking a deeper analysis about its cultural relevance. The Power of Provocative Language in Faith Conversations Language serves not only as a tool for communication but also as a weapon for engagement and challenge in discourse surrounding faith, culture, and political ideologies. When the term “Charlie Kirk” is used derogatorily, it indicates a deeper societal concern among different belief systems. The emergence of such phrases underscores how language can shape perceptions of various figures and movements. Believers, skeptics, and even seekers can find value in recognizing the power of words in fostering dialogues about faith and critical thought within cultural and political realms. Connecting Faith and Politics: The Charlie Kirk Phenomenon Charlie Kirk's presence embodies the intersection of faith and political activism. His advocacy for conservative Christian values resonated particularly well with youth and college students experiencing the complexities of their beliefs in contemporary society. As the narrative unfolds, we observe an increasing number of young people grappling with questions of identity, faith, and morality while navigating a politically charged environment. This fusion of faith and politics raises critical questions about how the Church can equip the next generation to respond to challenges with grace and truth. The Role of Humor in Engaging Serious Topics In his conversations, Nurse Maleek often incorporates humor to address serious issues surrounding faith and public discourse. This method not only disarms tension but invites listeners into a space where complex ideas can be considered more freely. For young believers and those from various backgrounds, humor can be a bridge that fosters discussion and understanding, allowing for more lighthearted engagements with serious conversations about their beliefs. The Importance of Contextual Analysis in Understanding Current Events When we look at the cultural milieu surrounding terms like “Charlie Kirk,” it’s essential to frame our discussions using historical context and theological insights. The popularity and critique of any public figure often reflect societal tensions and shifts. As followers of Christ, understanding these dynamics provides an opportunity to respond thoughtfully rather than react impulsively. Engaging in this contextual analysis is vital for church leaders, educators, and parents shaping young minds on issues of faith and cultural relevance. Appealing to Skeptics and Seekers This term's usage also invites introspection for skeptics and seekers. The phrase “to Charlie Kirk me” might initially provoke defensiveness; however, it can also present a unique opportunity for deeper exploration into the heart of how faith influences interactions in politically charged environments. Skeptics are often searching for genuine conversations about faith without the baggage of ridicule, and learning how to engage with these terms thoughtfully can create pathways toward understanding and grace. Conclusion: Navigating Ideologies with Grace and Truth In times of confusion and cultural polarization, believers are called to navigate the complexities of tastefully engaging in discourse about faith and politics. As we reflect on the phrase “Charlie Kirk” and its implications, we are reminded of the importance of speaking truthfully in love. Encouraging the next generation to respond to provocations with compassion and understanding is essential. It is within these discussions that faith truly comes to life. Take a moment to reflect on how language influences your conversations about faith in modern contexts. Engage with your peers, challenge yourself to dive deeper into the meaning behind words and experiences that shape your perspectives. Language can bridge divides or create them; choose wisely.

01.13.2026

Exposing Cover-up Culture in Charismatic Churches: Bob Hartley's Legacy

Update The Unraveling of a Cover-up Culture The recent exposé involving Bob Hartley, a prominent figure in the Charismatic church movement, sheds light on a troubling pattern of secrecy and protectionism that has persisted for decades. In the video titled "Bethel wouldn't stop him so his son and victims are going public," we delve into accounts from his son, Jedediah Hartley, alongside testimonies from Michelle Seidler, a woman who claims to be a victim of Hartley's alleged manipulation and deceit.In 'Bethel wouldn't stop him so his son and victims are going public,' the discussion dives into the troubling behaviors of Bob Hartley, revealing key insights that sparked deeper analysis on our end. Understanding the Impact of Hartley’s Actions Jedediah's courageous decision to speak out illustrates a profound issue within the church community—namely, the difficulty of addressing misconduct within esteemed religious figures. Hartley’s purported practice of using fake prophecies to manipulate women highlights a darker side of spiritual leadership. The ramifications of this behavior reach far beyond individual victims, calling into question the very fabric and integrity of church leadership. The Role of Church Leadership The video brings to light the apparent failures of Bethel leadership in handling allegations against Hartley, emphasizing an unsettling trend commonly referred to as a "Cover-up Culture." In many churches, there exists a hesitance to confront wrongdoing amongst influential members due to fear of backlash or the desire to maintain a pristine public image. This situation begs the question: What is the responsibility of church leaders to protect their congregants? It becomes increasingly clear that the failure to act not only harms individuals directly involved but risks damaging the faith community as a whole. Counterpoints and Diverse Perspectives While some may argue that the allegations against Hartley stem from misunderstandings or misinterpretations of his intentions, it is essential to consider the voices of the victims who have stepped forward. Michelle Seidler’s testimony, supported by other witnesses, challenges those who seek to dismiss the accusations as mere rumors. The pursuit of healing and justice for victims should take precedence over protecting the reputations of influential figures. Historical Context of Charismatic Movements The Charismatic movement, with key organizations like Bethel Church, IHOPKC, and Morningstar, has historically positioned itself as a vibrant and dynamic expression of the Christian faith. However, its rapid growth might have contributed to a lack of rigorous accountability structures, thereby enabling a climate where abuses could go unchecked. Exploring the historical development of these institutions provides a vital backdrop for understanding contemporary issues within the church. Examining past incidents of mismanagement may allow current and future leaders to establish more robust systems of accountability. The Call for Transparent Leadership For the church to regain trust and fulfill its mission, there must be a commitment to transparency and integrity. Leaders must demonstrate a willingness to openly address accusations, even when they involve their own ranks. This will not only serve to protect the faithful but also ensure the church remains a safe haven for all. Practical Insights: What Can We Do? Engaging with these issues requires proactive measures from church communities. Congregants should advocate for clear policies on reporting misconduct, emphasize the importance of accountability, and encourage dialogue about these sensitive topics. By fostering a culture of openness, churches can better serve their congregations and exemplify true Christian values. The Value of Speaking Out Both Jedediah and Michelle’s decision to come forward is not just an act of personal bravery; it’s a call to action for others who may have suffered in silence. Their testimonies underscore the importance of speaking out against injustice to foster healing and change. When individuals know they are not alone in their experiences, it can embolden others to seek justice. Thus, as the story of Bob Hartley unfolds, let it serve as an impetus for churches to reflect on their practices and ensure that all members are protected and valued. Only through addressing these hard conversations can the church cultivate a community that truly reflects the teachings of Christ. Call to Action As we consider these critical revelations, it is paramount that we remain vigilant and supportive of victims of church malpractice. If you or someone you know has faced spiritual abuse, consider reaching out for support in your community and advocating for practices that hold leaders accountable. Together, we can foster a healthier, more transparent church environment.

01.13.2026

Exploring What Orthodoxy Means to a Protestant: Faith, Diversity, and Understanding

Update Understanding the Complexity of Orthodoxy in Protestantism In recent discussions among various Christian communities, the question arises: What is Orthodoxy to a Protestant? This inquiry is not only fundamental to inter-denominational dialogue but also vital for self-examination within the Protestant tradition itself. Orthodoxy, often defined as adhering to the accepted doctrines of faith, poses unique challenges and perspectives particularly viewed through the lens of Protestant beliefs.In the video titled 'What is Orthodoxy to a Protestant?', a nuanced discussion surrounds the concept of Orthodoxy, prompting us to analyze the deeper meanings and implications for modern believers. Contextualizing Orthodoxy: A Historical Perspective To truly grasp what Orthodoxy means for Protestants, it's essential to explore its historical roots. Following the Protestant Reformation in the 16th century, pivotal figures like Martin Luther and John Calvin challenged the established Catholic orthodoxy, advocating for a return to scriptural foundations. This historical backdrop is critical; it marks the birth of a movement where personal interpretation and direct access to the Scriptures became paramount. Hence, Protestant Orthodoxy cannot simply be understood as a rejection of Catholic doctrine but as a reformulation of faith practices emphasizing individual faith and a personal relationship with God. The Diverse Landscape of Protestant Belief The Protestant movement is not monolithic—the sheer diversity within different denominations (Baptists, Methodists, Lutherans, Anglicans, and many more) presents a rich tapestry of beliefs about Orthodoxy. For instance, while some denominations adhere strictly to the creeds and confessions as a guide to orthodoxy, others embrace a more liberal approach, allowing for cultural and contextual adaptations. Within such a framework, understanding Orthodox doctrine becomes essential not only for maintaining unity within the church but also for witnessing to the broader world. The Role of Scripture in Defining Orthodoxy Central to the Protestant understanding of Orthodoxy is the authority of Scripture. Unlike the Catholic perspective that incorporates tradition and ecclesiastical authority, Protestantism emphasizes 'sola scriptura'—the idea that the Bible alone is sufficient for faith and practice. This assures that orthodoxy isn't just a rigid dogma but a dynamic and living engagement with the Bible. This profound reliance on Scripture shapes how believers approach theological discussions, including the nature of God, salvation, and the role of the church. A Reflection on Skepticism and Faith For believers in today’s pluralistic society, encountering skepticism is inevitable. Those categorized as skeptics or seekers often challenge established interpretations of faith, questioning whether orthodoxy is too restrictive or whether it aligns with their lived experiences. This intersection of skepticism and orthodoxy invites a critical examination of one’s beliefs—what does it mean to be orthodox in a world that values personal truth? Engaging in these discussions can lead not only to deeper personal conviction but also to stronger communal ties as faith communities navigate through doubts together. Engaging Youth and Future Generations Youth and college students often grapple with these theological complexities as they explore their identities and beliefs in a rapidly changing world. Educators and church leaders play a vital role in guiding the younger generation through these inquiries. Promoting a thoughtful understanding of orthodoxy can assist them in articulating their faith amidst the diverse and often conflicting views they encounter in cultural discourse. This nurturing of intellectual engagement with faith leads to mature believers who can confidently embrace their identities as members of the Protestant tradition. Counterarguments to Traditional Views of Orthodoxy While the term 'orthodoxy' typically invokes notions of unyielding doctrine, various perspectives challenge this view. Critics argue for a more fluid understanding, suggesting that clinging too tightly to traditionalistic interpretations can alienate seekers and new believers. In a postmodern context, where the quest for meaning demands flexibility and inclusion, what are the implications for Protestant orthodoxy? This discussion is crucial, as it encourages a broader inclusion within the faith community. Conclusions: The Future of Orthodoxy in Protestantism In conclusion, as believers navigate questions of Orthodoxy, the path is nuanced and multifaceted. From historical roots to contemporary challenges faced by the youth, understanding what orthodoxy means within Protestantism is critical for both faith development and community cohesion. As we reflect, share, and engage in dialogue about these topics, we not only strengthen our own faith but also contribute to a more enriched understanding of the diverse beliefs that shape our communities. For those invested in deepening their understanding of Christian theology and participation in meaningful discussions, I encourage you to engage within your faith communities. Share insights with one another, explore the resources available for further study, and most importantly, seek to understand different perspectives as we navigate this journey together.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*