Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update

Biblical Living Unlocked

Logo - Biblical living unlocked
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Biblical Parenting
    • Parenting Tips
    • Family Fellowship
    • Bible Teaching
    • Apologetics
    • Community Stories
    • Youth Focus
    • International
    • Walton Evangelical Church
    • Salt Church Mar Menor
    • Salt Church Los Montesinos
    • John Piper
    • News & Offers
Add Element
  • Ken on Facebook
    update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
4 Minutes Read

They Are Trying to Shame Us out of Good Theology by Misrepresenting Penal Substitution



Why Did Jesus Die? Understanding the Cross and God’s Love

Introduction

The Bible teaches that Jesus died for our sins. But some people today are mocking or misunderstanding what that means. Pastor Mike Winger explains why Jesus died on the cross, what it really shows us about God, and why some popular ideas about it are wrong. Let’s take a closer look at what the Bible says and why it matters.

What Is Penal Substitution?

Jesus Took Our Place

The word “penal” comes from the idea of punishment. “Substitution” means someone taking someone else’s place. So “penal substitution” means Jesus was punished in our place. He took the punishment we deserve for our sin.

Romans 5:8 says,

“But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.”

This doesn’t mean God was angry and needed to hurt someone. It means Jesus willingly took our punishment so that we could be forgiven and become friends with God.

Common Misunderstandings

Is God Violent and Angry?

Some people wrongly say that penal substitution teaches that God is mean or bloodthirsty. They say things like, “Would a loving God really kill his own son?”

But this is not what Christians believe. The Bible shows that:

• Jesus chose to die. He wasn’t forced. (John 10:18)

• Jesus is God the Son. He and the Father are one. (John 10:30)

• God is both just and loving. (Romans 3:26)

So the cross is not about God losing his temper. It’s about his perfect justice and love meeting in one amazing act.

Is It Like Pagan Sacrifices?

No, It’s Completely Different

Some critics say that penal substitution is like ancient pagan sacrifices, where people killed animals or even humans to make angry gods happy.

But the Bible teaches the opposite:

1. Jesus is our true representative – He stood in for all of us. (Romans 5:19)

2. It’s about justice, not cruelty – God must deal with sin fairly. (Deuteronomy 32:4)

3. Jesus bore our sin willingly – He gave himself. (Galatians 2:20)

4. God gave the sacrifice – God provided what we could never offer. (John 3:16)

So the cross is not a copy of pagan ideas. It’s the complete answer to sin that only God could give.

Did God Pour Out His Wrath on Jesus?

Understanding God’s Holy Anger

The Bible speaks about God’s “wrath” – this means his holy anger against sin. It’s not a selfish rage but a right response to evil.

Romans 5:9 says,

“Since we have now been justified by his blood, how much more shall we be saved from God’s wrath through him!”

Jesus suffered the punishment we deserve. That’s why we can now be saved from God’s wrath and welcomed as his children.

Jesus Reveals God’s Love and Justice

Not One or the Other – Both Together

Some say the cross only shows God’s love, not his justice. Others think it’s only about punishment. But the Bible teaches both.

At the cross:

• God shows his love by sending his Son. (John 3:16)

• God shows his justice by punishing sin. (Isaiah 53:5)

Jesus didn’t save us from a bad, angry God. He is God, and he came to save us from sin and its consequences.

Is the Father Against the Son?

No – They Are United

Some critics say penal substitution divides the Trinity – like the Father punishing the Son while the Son tries to protect us.

But Jesus said: “Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father.” (John 14:9)

The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit work together in perfect unity. The Father sends the Son. The Son obeys willingly. The Spirit helps us believe and understand. (Romans 8:11)

Why Couldn’t God Just Forgive Us?

God Is Just and Loving

Some ask, “Why didn’t God just forgive us without Jesus dying?”

The answer is: Because God is just. He can’t pretend sin doesn’t matter. But because God is love, he made a way to forgive us—by taking the punishment himself.

Romans 3:26 says, “He did this to demonstrate his righteousness… so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus.”

The Parable of the Prodigal Son

Doesn’t That Show Forgiveness Without Punishment?

Some people use Jesus’ parable of the prodigal son (Luke 15:11–32) to say that God doesn’t need to punish sin to forgive us.

But that story isn’t about the whole message of the cross. It shows that God is eager to welcome us when we return. But Jesus still had to make that return possible through his death.

God’s Wrath and God’s Love Are Not Opposites

They Go Together at the Cross

Critics often ask, “Is God loving or punishing?” But that’s a false choice. God is both loving and just. That’s why the cross is so powerful.

1 Thessalonians 1:10 says, “Jesus, who rescues us from the coming wrath.”

Jesus saves us from the judgment we deserve, by taking it himself. That is perfect love.

Conclusion

The cross of Jesus is not a picture of cruelty—it’s a picture of God’s amazing love and justice. Jesus wasn’t a helpless victim. He chose to die for us. God didn’t hurt an innocent stranger. He gave himself to save us.

Let’s not be ashamed of the cross, even when people mock it. The Bible tells us clearly:

“The message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.” (1 Corinthians 1:18)

Jesus died so that we could live. That’s the heart of the gospel.

Key Bible References

• Romans 5:8–9

• John 3:16

• Isaiah 53:5

• Romans 3:26

• Galatians 2:20

• 1 Thessalonians 1:10

• 1 Corinthians 1:18

• John 10:18

• John 14:9

• Luke 15:11–32








Apologetics

16 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
01.18.2026

Navigating Doxxing in Faith Discussions: Insights for Communities and Believers

Update Understanding Doxxing: A Growing Threat Doxxing, or publicly revealing private information about individuals without their consent, has become a significant threat in the digital age. Recently, a conversation has emerged surrounding this issue as it pertains to individuals in the religious community. In the video titled "Muslims DOX Me, GodLogic, & InspiringPhilosophy (Trying to End Us?)", the host shared distressing experiences involving doxxing incidents that affected not only him but also other prominent figures in the community. This brings to light the broader implications of personal safety and the ethics of engaging in debates on faith and theology online.In "Muslims DOX Me, GodLogic, & InspiringPhilosophy (Trying to End Us?)," the discussion revolves around the alarming trend of doxxing and its implications, prompting us to delve deeper into the issues that surround personal safety and ethical engagement in faith discussions. The Personal Impact of Online Attacks For believers and skeptics alike, the personal impacts of online attacks can be devastating. In the video, the host recounts how his wife and home address were exposed as a result of doxxing by someone known as Maleek the Dawah Snitch. This not only endangers their physical safety but also serves as an anxiety-inducing reminder of the hostility that can permeate discussions about faith. The ripple effects of such actions extend beyond personal safety; they can lead to a chilling effect on open dialogue about critical theological and ideological matters. The Fine Line Between Advocacy and Harassment While advocating for one’s beliefs is essential to religious discourse, the lines can sometimes blur into harassment. The host, alongside Thaddeus and Chris, discusses the nuances of standing firm in one’s faith while facing hostility. This conversation needs to resonate within our communities, encouraging thoughtful engagement rather than animosity. When discussing faith, how do we ensure that we are maintaining integrity in our interactions? The dangers of conflating dissent with personal attack must be addressed in our approach to apologetics. Fostering Respectful Dialogue in Religious Debates Respectful dialogue in religious contexts is pivotal, particularly in an era where discussions often escalate into personal attacks and vitriolic disputes. As believers, we must reflect on how we engage with others, particularly those from other faiths. What strategies can effectively foster this respect? Encouraging a culture of mutual understanding rather than condescension while addressing questions about faith can go a long way in maintaining integrity during debates. Strategies such as active listening and empathetic responses could transform heated discussions into constructive dialogues. Reflections for Young Believers and Skeptics Youth and college students often find themselves navigating faith discussions both online and offline. In light of this doxxing incident, how should young believers or skeptics approach theological debates? It might be crucial for educators and mentors to provide tools for safe engagement. This involves understanding the potential risks of public discussions and ensuring practices that prioritize community safety while fostering growth. An environment that encourages questions and honest exploration of beliefs can empower young minds to engage without fear of retaliation. Resilience in Faith and Community The challenge posed by doxxing and hostility towards public figures serves as a reminder for faith communities to advance resilience. The discussion in the video encourages believers to be vigilant yet assuring in their faith journey. Communities must band together to support one another in the face of adversity. By doing so, individuals can find strength in their collective experiences, making them more resilient to online harassment. How can local churches foster this communal support? Establishing stronger ties and ensuring that individual voices are heard can enhance the community's protective measures. Conclusion: Responding Wisely The conversation sparked by the doxxing incidents discussed in "Muslims DOX Me, GodLogic, & InspiringPhilosophy (Trying to End Us?)" offers important insights into navigating faith under attack. As believers and skeptics engage in discussions, prioritizing respectful dialogue, communal resilience, and personal safety must remain at the forefront. We invite readers to reflect on their roles within this conversation, championing values that encourage healthy discourse in the face of adversity. As we navigate these challenging waters, let us promote understanding and respect for diverse beliefs. If you feel inspired to contribute to a more respectful discussion environment in religious contexts, consider sharing these insights with your community or participating in local dialogues that focus on understanding and mutual respect.

01.18.2026

Interracial Marriage Debate: Biblical Foundations and Cultural Insights

Update Understanding the Resurgence of the Interracial Marriage Debate The topic of interracial marriage recently re-emerged, shedding light on the evolving cultural dynamics surrounding marriage and identity. A debate hosted by leading figures Ruslan and GodLogic on one side, and Webbon, Griffith, and Todd on the other, highlights the complexities and varying viewpoints on this sensitive issue. What does this continuing dialogue indicate about our society today? How does it intersect with biblical teachings and the transformative nature of love across racial lines?In 'The Interracial Marriage Debate is Back | My Response', the discussion dives into recent intense debates uncovering varying viewpoints on this critical cultural topic. The Bible’s Perspective on Marriage When examining the issue of interracial marriage, it is essential to consult the Bible, which offers insights into God’s design for unity among all people. Biblical texts often emphasize the principles of love, commitment, and respect above ethnic differences. For instance, Galatians 3:28 declares, “There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” This emphasizes a core Christian belief that in Christ, cultural and racial distinctions should not divide us. What Historical Context Influences Today’s Debate? Historically, the conversation surrounding interracial marriage has been fraught with challenges, particularly in contexts where social norms dictated rigid racial boundaries. As societal acceptance expanded, particularly in Western cultures, interracial marriages began to flourish, yet prejudices and antagonism can still resurface. Understanding these historical contexts is vital to navigating current discussions effectively. Exploring Cultural Critiques and Counterarguments Critics of interracial marriage often bring up concerns about cultural identity and familial harmony. They argue that such marriages can dilute cultural heritage or lead to conflicts within families. However, many advocates highlight the enriching experiences that come from blending different cultures and traditions within families. As society progresses, the definition of unity grows more expansive, allowing individuals to create newfound relationships that challenge outdated norms. Future Predictions: A More Inclusive Society? As we look ahead, it becomes crucial to consider the potential pathways for a more inclusive society. The ongoing debates could lead to more dialogues, educational resources, and community-building initiatives aimed at fostering understanding and acceptance. With younger generations, especially youth and college students, becoming increasingly open to diverse relationships, we may anticipate a gradual normalization of interracial unions in the broader cultural narrative. Encouraging Conversations Around the Dinner Table For parents and church leaders, the current dialogue serves as an excellent opportunity to discuss love and acceptance in families and faith communities. Engaging youth in conversations on the significance of inclusivity and understanding can empower them to foster environments where diversity is celebrated. This will not only strengthen these young individuals' faith but also deepen their awareness of cultural implications in modern relationships. The video we analyzed, The Interracial Marriage Debate is Back | My Response, presents insights into this ongoing issue, sparking important conversations that encourage us to reflect on our own beliefs and assumptions regarding marriage and relationships. The discussions highlighted in the debate challenge us to consider what biblical teachings say about acceptance and unity among all believers. This topic is particularly relevant as many grapple with issues of identity and belonging in today’s world. Whether we are believers seeking to strengthen our faith, skeptics exploring theological perspectives, or simply curious about cultural dynamics, the integration of varied viewpoints around interracial marriage opens doors for meaningful discourse. As we continue exploring these themes, it’s important to embrace dialogues around love, acceptance, and the scriptural foundation that supports unity among diverse backgrounds. Engaging with this material could also encourage active participation in faith communities and foster healthier relational dynamics.

01.18.2026

How "Save the puppies! Quick!" Sparks a Call for Compassionate Action

Update The Importance of Compassion in Our Faith In an age where media often highlights urgent needs and crises, it’s vital for us as Christians to engage not only with spiritual matters but also with the pressing issues facing our communities. The recent video titled "Save the puppies! Quick!" draws attention to the plight of animals and the call for compassion in our everyday lives. While the focus might be on saving puppies today, the larger question we grapple with as a faith community is how to extend our care and compassion to all of God’s creations.In the video "Save the puppies! Quick!", the discussion dives into the urgency of compassion for animals, exploring key insights that sparked deeper analysis on our end. Empathy as a Christian Principle The teachings of Jesus remind us of the significance of empathy. When Jesus spoke about caring for the least among us (Matthew 25:40), he included not just humans but the entire creation that expresses God’s love. The urgency of the message in the video challenges us to consider our role in advocating for animals and our responsibilities within the biblical context of stewardship. Caring for all creatures reflects the heart of God, who established the world and called it good. Connecting Biblical Teachings to Contemporary Issues The call to action presented in "Save the puppies! Quick!" can be closely connected to the broader biblical theme of caring for those in need, be they people or animals. The message resonates with Proverbs 12:10, which states, “A righteous man cares for the needs of his animal.” This biblical perspective invites us to explore how we can integrate responsible pet ownership and community welfare into our daily lives and our church initiatives. Social Responsibility and Church Engagement In actively addressing the needs highlighted in the video, we align our church missions with practical applications of our faith. Engaging in community service projects that advocate for animal welfare not only sends a profound message of love and compassion but also strengthens our bonds within the congregation. It serves as a practical expression of faith, moving from the theoretical into actionable love. Emotional Connection and Practical Ways to Help This video urges an emotional response—a sense of urgency that should drive our actions. Feeling for the adorable puppies depicted prompts us to reflect on how we can channel our charitable instincts into practical assistance. Here are a few ways we can respond: Volunteer at Local Shelters: Put your time and skills to use in your community by helping at an animal shelter. Advocate for Responsible Pet Ownership: Teach friends and church members about the importance of caring for pets and the responsibilities that accompany pet ownership. Support Legislative Measures: Engage with local entities to support laws that protect animals from abuse or neglect. As a Christian community, taking initiative in these areas demonstrates our love for God’s creation while fostering a culture of service and compassion. Future Implications of Compassionate Action Looking ahead, it’s clear that communities that nurture compassion, whether for people or animals, set a precedent for justice and mercy. By acting upon messages like the one conveyed in the video, we could witness a ripple effect that transforms how society views responsibility toward all living beings. We must continue fostering dialogues around compassion and community care, ensuring they stay at the forefront of our church discussions. Conclusion: A Call to Action In conclusion, while the video "Save the puppies! Quick!" is a brief moment of urgency, it opens the door to meaningful conversations about compassion in our faith. As part of our religious practice, we must strive to embody empathy, extend our hands in service, and foster love within both our communities and the broader society. Let us seize this opportunity to make a significant impact, reflecting Christ's love through our actions. Consider how you can contribute to this call for compassion and how you can lead by example within your church community. The need is great, and together we can respond effectually.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*