Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update

Biblical Living Unlocked

Logo - Biblical living unlocked
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Biblical Parenting
    • Parenting Tips
    • Family Fellowship
    • Bible Teaching
    • Apologetics
    • Community Stories
    • Youth Focus
    • International
    • Walton Evangelical Church
    • Salt Church Mar Menor
    • Salt Church Los Montesinos
    • John Piper
Add Element
  • Ken on Facebook
    update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
4 Minutes Read

They Are Trying to Shame Us out of Good Theology by Misrepresenting Penal Substitution



Why Did Jesus Die? Understanding the Cross and God’s Love

Introduction

The Bible teaches that Jesus died for our sins. But some people today are mocking or misunderstanding what that means. Pastor Mike Winger explains why Jesus died on the cross, what it really shows us about God, and why some popular ideas about it are wrong. Let’s take a closer look at what the Bible says and why it matters.

What Is Penal Substitution?

Jesus Took Our Place

The word “penal” comes from the idea of punishment. “Substitution” means someone taking someone else’s place. So “penal substitution” means Jesus was punished in our place. He took the punishment we deserve for our sin.

Romans 5:8 says,

“But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.”

This doesn’t mean God was angry and needed to hurt someone. It means Jesus willingly took our punishment so that we could be forgiven and become friends with God.

Common Misunderstandings

Is God Violent and Angry?

Some people wrongly say that penal substitution teaches that God is mean or bloodthirsty. They say things like, “Would a loving God really kill his own son?”

But this is not what Christians believe. The Bible shows that:

• Jesus chose to die. He wasn’t forced. (John 10:18)

• Jesus is God the Son. He and the Father are one. (John 10:30)

• God is both just and loving. (Romans 3:26)

So the cross is not about God losing his temper. It’s about his perfect justice and love meeting in one amazing act.

Is It Like Pagan Sacrifices?

No, It’s Completely Different

Some critics say that penal substitution is like ancient pagan sacrifices, where people killed animals or even humans to make angry gods happy.

But the Bible teaches the opposite:

1. Jesus is our true representative – He stood in for all of us. (Romans 5:19)

2. It’s about justice, not cruelty – God must deal with sin fairly. (Deuteronomy 32:4)

3. Jesus bore our sin willingly – He gave himself. (Galatians 2:20)

4. God gave the sacrifice – God provided what we could never offer. (John 3:16)

So the cross is not a copy of pagan ideas. It’s the complete answer to sin that only God could give.

Did God Pour Out His Wrath on Jesus?

Understanding God’s Holy Anger

The Bible speaks about God’s “wrath” – this means his holy anger against sin. It’s not a selfish rage but a right response to evil.

Romans 5:9 says,

“Since we have now been justified by his blood, how much more shall we be saved from God’s wrath through him!”

Jesus suffered the punishment we deserve. That’s why we can now be saved from God’s wrath and welcomed as his children.

Jesus Reveals God’s Love and Justice

Not One or the Other – Both Together

Some say the cross only shows God’s love, not his justice. Others think it’s only about punishment. But the Bible teaches both.

At the cross:

• God shows his love by sending his Son. (John 3:16)

• God shows his justice by punishing sin. (Isaiah 53:5)

Jesus didn’t save us from a bad, angry God. He is God, and he came to save us from sin and its consequences.

Is the Father Against the Son?

No – They Are United

Some critics say penal substitution divides the Trinity – like the Father punishing the Son while the Son tries to protect us.

But Jesus said: “Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father.” (John 14:9)

The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit work together in perfect unity. The Father sends the Son. The Son obeys willingly. The Spirit helps us believe and understand. (Romans 8:11)

Why Couldn’t God Just Forgive Us?

God Is Just and Loving

Some ask, “Why didn’t God just forgive us without Jesus dying?”

The answer is: Because God is just. He can’t pretend sin doesn’t matter. But because God is love, he made a way to forgive us—by taking the punishment himself.

Romans 3:26 says, “He did this to demonstrate his righteousness… so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus.”

The Parable of the Prodigal Son

Doesn’t That Show Forgiveness Without Punishment?

Some people use Jesus’ parable of the prodigal son (Luke 15:11–32) to say that God doesn’t need to punish sin to forgive us.

But that story isn’t about the whole message of the cross. It shows that God is eager to welcome us when we return. But Jesus still had to make that return possible through his death.

God’s Wrath and God’s Love Are Not Opposites

They Go Together at the Cross

Critics often ask, “Is God loving or punishing?” But that’s a false choice. God is both loving and just. That’s why the cross is so powerful.

1 Thessalonians 1:10 says, “Jesus, who rescues us from the coming wrath.”

Jesus saves us from the judgment we deserve, by taking it himself. That is perfect love.

Conclusion

The cross of Jesus is not a picture of cruelty—it’s a picture of God’s amazing love and justice. Jesus wasn’t a helpless victim. He chose to die for us. God didn’t hurt an innocent stranger. He gave himself to save us.

Let’s not be ashamed of the cross, even when people mock it. The Bible tells us clearly:

“The message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.” (1 Corinthians 1:18)

Jesus died so that we could live. That’s the heart of the gospel.

Key Bible References

• Romans 5:8–9

• John 3:16

• Isaiah 53:5

• Romans 3:26

• Galatians 2:20

• 1 Thessalonians 1:10

• 1 Corinthians 1:18

• John 10:18

• John 14:9

• Luke 15:11–32








Apologetics

13 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
11.04.2025

Is Marriage a Business? Exploring the Sacramental Covenant in Today's Context

Update Is Marriage a Business? Reexamining the Sacrament In today's fast-paced world, the concept of marriage is often debated, with questions surrounding its purpose and function. The provocative question, "Is marriage a business?" invites deep reflection. This inquiry leads many to explore how relationships can sometimes appear transactional, particularly within contemporary societal structures. By integrating a biblical perspective, we can balance this inquiry and shed light on the sacred nature of marriage.In 'Is Marriage a Business??', the discussion dives into the notion of marriage as a transaction, exploring key insights that sparked deeper analysis on our end. The Historical Context of Marriage Historically, marriage has served many purposes: economic alliance, political partnership, and social stability. In ancient cultures, unions were often made for political gain and family connections rather than romantic love. However, in the biblical narrative, marriage is elevated to a sacred covenant—a divine ordinance established by God. Genesis 2:24 underscores its divine foundation: "Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh." This proclamation highlights that, while practicalities previously dominated marriage, it ultimately is designed for deep relational unity. Faith and the Business Metaphor Some argue that viewing marriage through a transactional lens can lead to beneficial arrangements. Just as in business, where partners collaborate for mutual gain, spouses can work together to build a life of shared goals—financial stability, child-rearing, and emotional support. However, this perspective risks diminishing the commitment and sacrifice required in a covenantal marriage as outlined in Ephesians 5:25-33, which calls for love, respect, and selflessness. Instead of transactional engagement, there is a divine call to sacrificial love between partners. Modern Skepticism and Cultural Commentary This idea of marrying for mutual benefit has some roots in modern thinking, especially among younger generations who prioritize self-fulfillment and personal achievement. For many younger believers, especially in college and social environments, the traditional view of marriage clashes with the more individualistic and practical approach of today’s culture. This skepticism can prompt valuable conversations about the purpose of marriage in a secular vs. faith-based framework, allowing individuals to explore both the emotional and spiritual significance of unions. Practical Insights for the Future of Marriage Understanding marriage as a commitment rooted in God's covenant can guide practical steps for future couples. Engaging engaged couples or new spouses in discussions about their values and expectations is crucial. Workshops or counseling sessions led by church leaders can equip couples with the tools they need for lasting relationships, focusing on actions grounded in faith rather than transactional dynamics. Challenging the Myths of Marriage Many misconceptions surround marriage, particularly the belief that love alone is sufficient for a successful union. Biblical teachings emphasize that love is foundational but requires ongoing commitment, sacrifice, and effort. These biblical principles provide a corrective to the business-like mentality that can creep into relationships, reminding couples of their higher calling to reflect God’s love. The Importance of Community Support As families and communities look towards strengthening marriages, fostering a culture of support is essential. This not only applies within family structures but also extends into church settings where mentorship relationships can thrive. Building a tradition of openness and shared experiences can dilute the transactional interpretation of marriage and instead reinforce the heartfelt virtues of commitment and love. In conclusion, while exploring the question, "Is marriage a business?" can spark necessary dialogues about the nature of relationships today, it is vital to ground those discussions in the biblical understanding of marriage as a sacred covenant. With the right mindset and community support, we can create marriages that flourish not merely as transactions but as life-giving partnerships that reflect God's purpose.

11.03.2025

Are Jordan Peterson's Health Issues a Sign of Allah's Punishment?

Update The Dilemma of Faith: Understanding Reactions to Jordan Peterson's Health In the tackle of spirituality and humanity, the discussion surrounding Jordan Peterson’s recent health issues has ignited a wave of dialogue, particularly in the Muslim community. As Peterson, a prominent figure known for his thought-provoking ideas, faces significant health challenges, the implications of his struggles have become a focal point for various religious perspectives. One controversial take comes from Ali Dawa, who insinuates that Peterson's afflictions are divine punishments for a controversial tweet made amidst the political turmoil concerning Gaza.In 'Is Allah Punishing Jordan Peterson for THIS?', the discussion dives into the implications of Jordan Peterson's health issues, exploring key social and spiritual insights that sparked deeper analysis on our end. Health Issues and Social Inquiry Peterson's daughter, Michaela, provided an update detailing her father's battles with pneumonia, sepsis, and neurological issues attributed to chronic inflammatory response syndrome, which surfaced after environmental factors. The health crisis not only highlights the fragility of human existence but also serves as an opportunity for broader social reflection on how public figures are perceived in times of adversity. While many offer thoughts of concern and healing, others, like Dawa, juxtapose Peterson's suffering with an interpreted divine response regarding moral standing based on a tweet amidst human conflict. The Intersection of Faith and Human Experience This scenario raises compelling questions about how faith groups interpret suffering. From a biblical perspective, we often acknowledge that suffering, while painful, may arise not as a punishment but as a means of growth or realization. Dawa’s assertion that Peterson is being punished by Allah plays into a narrative that can be potentially harmful, as it disregards the individuality of suffering and the complex relationship we as humans have with our circumstances. Revisiting the Nature of Divine Justice In exploring this topic, it’s crucial to differentiate the human tendency to seek retribution or to ascribe punishment for religious or moral failures. One could argue that such outlooks create a dualistic moral landscape that oversimplifies the intricacies of God's justice—transforming divine will into a transactional relationship. Micah 6:8 reminds us that God desires justice, mercy, and humility rather than a simplistic view of suffering as a one-dimensional punishment. The Problem of Perception: What’s Missing? Another dimension worth exploring is the selective nature of outrage surrounding suffering and injustice. Dawa and others criticize Peterson for individual statements while tendentiously overlooking other coordinated acts of violence or suffering affecting broader communities. This highlights a fundamental inconsistency in moral outrage that invites skepticism from rational thinkers. For believers seeking to strengthen their faith, such discrepancies can pose substantial challenges in reconciling doctrinal teachings with human realities. Facing the Existential Storm: A Call to Compassion As supporters of Peterson extend prayers and encouragement, what becomes paramount is the deep consideration for compassion over judgement. Regardless of one's stance on Peterson's views, the human experience is united through the lens of empathy, especially during dire times of personal strife. This is an opportunity for those who engage with these discussions to foster dialogue and understanding instead of division. Understanding and Moving Forward As discussions surrounding Peterson enhance amid his health struggles, it becomes critical for critics and supporters alike to redirect focus from punitive narratives toward collective healing. The experience of illness should remind us all of shared humanity and the importance of compassion in dialogue. The world grows increasingly polarized, but ultimately, fostering understanding amidst diverse perspectives fosters a rich and helpful community. Final Thoughts: Embracing a Unified Perspective In times of difficulty, whether politically or personally, it’s beneficial to remember the delicate balance between faith, understanding, and compassion. Let’s engage thoughtfully, love each other fiercely regardless of beliefs or affiliations, and pray for healing not just for Jordan Peterson but for all suffering around the globe. The article reminds us that suffering is a shared human experience, and how we respond can either build bridges or deepen divides when faced with human struggle.

11.03.2025

Why Understanding 'The Muslim Panic Has Begun' Matters to Us All

Update The Rise of Fear: Unpacking 'The Muslim Panic Has Begun' As the western world witnesses an upsurge in discussions about immigration and cultural integration, the title "The Muslim Panic Has Begun" encapsulates rising concerns and fears surrounding Muslim communities. In conversations that swirl around the intersection of faith, culture, and politics, it is crucial to engage thoughtfully and biblically with these urgent topics. Understanding this phenomenon through a lens of biblical thinking not only helps in fostering a spirit of compassion but also allows for a clearer understanding of how to approach these complex discussions.In 'The Muslim Panic Has Begun', the discussion dives into rising fears surrounding Muslim communities, exploring key insights that sparked deeper analysis on our end. Historical Context: Interactions Through the Ages Throughout history, the relationship between Christianity and Islam has been multifaceted. From early confrontations during the Crusades to modern interfaith dialogues, the narratives of fear and misunderstanding have often overshadowed the potential for collaboration and mutual understanding. In our contemporary context, understanding this historical backdrop is crucial in addressing present-day fears without falling into the trap of blanket assumptions about an entire faith community. Every historical moment offers insights into how to approach current fears with empathy and understanding; history teaches us that fear often arises from unfamiliarity. Emotional and Human Interest Angles: Voices from the Community A key element in understanding any community is hearing the voices of its members. Many Muslims in the West express feelings of anxiety and alienation amidst rising tensions. Stories of individuals facing discrimination or exclusion because of their faith highlight the human aspect behind the statistics. It’s essential to consider these narratives, as they remind us of our shared humanity. Engaging with Muslims not only fosters a better understanding but also builds relationships that challenge fear and division. These personal stories can lead to an authentic dialogue that nurtures understanding among diverse communities. Relevance to Current Events: A Culture of Fear News reports often highlight sensational incidents that inadvertently feed into existing fears, creating a cycle that perpetuates misunderstanding. The narrative termed as "The Muslim Panic" is symptomatic of a broader cultural anxiety regarding immigration, national identity, and security. It calls for a biblically-informed response that emphasizes love, understanding, and unity rather than fear. As Christians, addressing these events with a perspective that values peace and reconciliation is crucial for community cohesion. Instead of fanning the flames of panic, we should advocate for conversations that promote peace and coexistence. Future Insights: Building Bridges of Understanding Looking ahead, we must consider how to foster a culture that values conversations over conflict. As communities evolve, the challenge will be to dismantle prejudices and build understanding. Initiatives that promote interfaith dialogues in places like churches, schools, and community centers can pave the way for healing. By offering safe spaces for discussions on faith and identity, we can create environments where fear is replaced by fellowship and understanding. Biblical teachings encourage us to be peacemakers and advocates of dialogue — a message that is especially critical in times of societal anxiety. Decisions You Can Make: Engaging Your Community Taking informed actions can minimize the impacts of fear-driven narratives. Begin by educating yourself on Islam, its teachings, and the actual experiences of Muslims in your community. Attend interfaith events or engage in conversations with local Muslim leaders and groups. Simple acts of kindness, such as advocating for inclusive practices within your church or community, can go a long way toward building relationships that challenge harmful stereotypes. Every small step you take contributes to a broader culture of understanding and peace. As headlines continue to rise around narratives of panic and division, staying anchored in biblical teachings offers clarity and direction. Rather than succumbing to fear, the call to love and serve others remains paramount. How we choose to respond to such narratives shapes the future of our communities. Understanding others through the lens of Christ's love can transform fear into a powerful agent for good. If you feel compelled to engage in meaningful dialogue about this topic, consider reaching out to your local community leaders or church to explore opportunities for interfaith discussions. The journey toward understanding begins with your willingness to take those first steps.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*