Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update

Biblical Living Unlocked

Logo - Biblical living unlocked
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Biblical Parenting
    • Parenting Tips
    • Family Fellowship
    • Bible Teaching
    • Apologetics
    • Community Stories
    • Youth Focus
    • International
    • Walton Evangelical Church
    • Salt Church Mar Menor
    • Salt Church Los Montesinos
    • John Piper
    • News & Offers
Add Element
  • Ken on Facebook
    update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
4 Minutes Read

The Real History of Penal Substitutionary Atonement

How Does Jesus Save Us? Understanding Penal Substitutionary Atonement

By Mike Winger, Simplified and Explained


Introduction: What Did Jesus Do on the Cross?

At the very heart of Christianity is a big question: how does Jesus save us? One way Christians have explained this is through something called Penal Substitutionary Atonement (PSA). That’s a mouthful, but it simply means this:

Jesus took our punishment so we could be forgiven and brought back to God.

This idea is not new. It’s been around since the early days of the Church and is taught clearly in the Bible.

What Does Penal Substitutionary Atonement Mean?

Let’s break it down into three simple parts:

• Penal – This comes from the word penalty. Because of sin, humans deserve a penalty. The Bible says, “The soul that sins shall die” (Ezekiel 18:20). Sin leads to separation from God and death.

• Substitutionary – This means Jesus took our place. He didn’t just die – He died for us. Like it says in Isaiah 53:5, “He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities.”

• Atonement – Atonement means to make things right between us and God. Through Jesus’s sacrifice, we are forgiven and made right with God (Romans 5:10).

So, put together: Jesus took the punishment we deserve (penal), in our place (substitution), to bring us back to God (atonement).

Why Do Some People Disagree?

Some modern teachers say PSA is a new idea that started only 500 years ago with a man named John Calvin. They argue that the early church didn’t believe this, and that PSA is based on legal thinking, not love.

But Pastor Mike Winger strongly disagrees. He believes that many early church leaders clearly taught that Jesus took the punishment for our sins.

Let’s look at what some of them said.

What Did Early Christians Believe?

Clement of Rome (c. 95 AD)

“Jesus Christ our Lord gave his blood for us… his body for our bodies, and his soul for our souls.”

This clearly shows substitution – Jesus gave Himself in our place.

Ignatius (c. 107 AD)

“He suffered all these things for our sakes that we might be saved.”

Jesus suffered so that we could be saved – that’s penalty and substitution.

Epistle of Barnabas (c. 70–135 AD)

This early Christian writing quotes Isaiah 53, which talks about the suffering servant taking the punishment for others’ sins.

“He was wounded for our transgressions… and with His stripes we are healed.”

The Epistle to Diognetus (2nd century)

“The righteous one for the unrighteous… Oh sweet exchange!”

This describes the beautiful exchange – Jesus took our place so we could be free.

Justin Martyr (c. 100–165 AD)

“The Father… wished his Christ to take upon himself the curses of all.”

Jesus took on the curse (the penalty) so we could be forgiven.


Isn’t There Another View? What About Christus Victor?

Yes, another way people understand the cross is called Christus Victor, which means “Christ the Victor.” This view says that Jesus defeated sin, death, and the devil.

But here’s the thing: Christus Victor and Penal Substitution are not enemies. They go hand in hand.

• PSA explains how Jesus won the victory (by taking our place).

• Christus Victor explains what the result was (Jesus defeated sin and death).

As Pastor Mike says, “They are sisters, not rivals.”


Does the Bible Support PSA?

Absolutely. The Bible is full of verses that teach penal substitution. Here are a few:

• Isaiah 53:5–6 – “The punishment that brought us peace was on him… the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all.”

• 2 Corinthians 5:21 – “God made him who had no sin to be sin for us.”

• Galatians 3:13 – “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us.”

• 1 Peter 2:24 – “He himself bore our sins in his body on the cross.”

These verses clearly show Jesus took our punishment to make us right with God.


Was God Angry at Jesus?

Some people say PSA makes it sound like God was cruel – even calling it “cosmic child abuse.” But this is a misunderstanding.

Here’s the truth: God was not punishing someone else. God Himself – in the person of Jesus – came to take our place. Jesus said, “No one takes my life from me, but I lay it down of my own accord” (John 10:18).

So, Jesus wasn’t a victim. He willingly gave Himself to save us. “But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8).


Conclusion: Why It Matters

Penal Substitutionary Atonement shows us two important things:

1. God is holy and just – He does not ignore sin.

2. God is loving and merciful – He took the punishment Himself so we could be saved.

This isn’t a cold, legal idea. It’s the glorious good news of the gospel. It’s about how Jesus saves us by giving His life for ours.


Final Thought

If you ever doubt how much God loves you, just look at the cross. As it says in Isaiah 53:10, “Yet it was the Lord’s will to crush him and cause him to suffer… and the will of the Lord will prosper in his hand.”

God was pleased – not because of the pain – but because Jesus’s death would bring salvation, healing, and new life to anyone who believes.


That’s the heart of Christianity. And that’s why the cross changes everything.


Apologetics

17 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
01.19.2026

Discover the Truth About Paul’s Thorn in the Flesh: New Insights

Update Unpacking Paul’s Thorn in the Flesh: A Historical Overview Paul’s “thorn in the flesh” remains one of the most enigmatic phrases in the New Testament, sparking countless interpretations and debates among scholars and believers alike. It is found in the second letter to the Corinthians, where Paul shares a personal struggle that he says was given to him to keep him humble. The phrase raises questions: What was this thorn? Was it a medical ailment, a spiritual battle, or perhaps a person causing strife in Paul’s ministry? New Testament scholar Ken Berding delves into these interpretations, offering valuable insights into this captivating topic.In 'What was Paul's "Thorn in the Flesh"? New Clues | DP #2', the discussion dives into the theological significance of Paul’s struggles, provoking deeper analysis and understanding. Understanding the Theological Significance As believers seek to strengthen their faith, it is essential to understand the theological implications of Paul’s thorn. Many interpretations focus on the notion that this affliction served a higher purpose in Paul's life— to ensure his reliance on God’s grace. This highlights a significant theme in Christianity: that struggles can lead to spiritual growth and reliance on divine strength. In a world that values perfection and success, Paul's admission of weakness serves as a powerful reminder that vulnerability can lead to deeper faith and commitment. Exploring Various Interpretations While there is no singular answer to the identity of Paul’s thorn, several interpretations have emerged through the centuries. Some scholars argue it was a physical ailment, possibly an eye condition or chronic illness, causing Paul to rely on God in profound ways. Others suggest it was spiritual opposition, representing physical persecution or challenges from fellow believers. Yet another hypothesis is that the thorn could have been a specific individual, perhaps a Judaizer, who continually opposed Paul’s message. Each interpretation opens a landscape for further discussion on how human struggles can manifest across different contexts. The Emotional and Human Angle For many in the faith community, identifying with Paul’s thorn resonates on an emotional level. Parents and educators, for instance, often face their own thorns in the form of values clashes, health issues, or significant life challenges. Understanding that such struggles are both common and redemptive can encourage believers to embrace their vulnerability as part of their faith journey. Paul’s relationship with his affliction underscores the importance of honesty in our spiritual walk, encouraging an awareness that faith can thrive amid difficulties. Counterarguments and Diverse Perspectives Some skeptics may question the value of analyzing such a personal aspect of Paul’s life. They may regard the quest for understanding as irrelevant to modern faith practice, yet this kind of inquiry can encourage deeper engagement with scripture and tradition. Even those outside the Christian faith can find the discussion around weakness, reliance on community, and personal integrity to be universally relevant. For Church leaders and ministry workers, it’s vital to create space for dialogues that incorporate diverse perspectives, fostering an environment where everyone feels heard and valued. Practical Insights for Contemporary Believers Paul's message in 2 Corinthians can inspire those grappling with their own figurative thorns. A practical approach might involve a reflective practice that contemplates one’s own sources of struggle and pain. By confronting these challenges, believers can learn to lean into their faith community and seek guidance from experienced mentors or biblical teachings. In doing so, they cultivate resilience and draw strength from their collective experiences. In conclusion, engaging with the concept of Paul’s “thorn in the flesh” provides an opportunity for believers to reflect on their own lives and the struggles they face. By understanding that these afflictions can often serve meaningful purposes in spiritual growth, readers are encouraged to shift their perspectives on pain and vulnerability. As we embrace our unique thorns, we recognize their potential to lead us to a deeper reliance on faith and community. If you found this exploration of Paul’s thorn insightful, consider engaging further with your faith community or seeking additional resources that encourage discussion on these profound topics. Understanding and contextualizing struggles, both personal and spiritual, can lead to transformative growth in faith and understanding.

01.18.2026

Navigating Doxxing in Faith Discussions: Insights for Communities and Believers

Update Understanding Doxxing: A Growing Threat Doxxing, or publicly revealing private information about individuals without their consent, has become a significant threat in the digital age. Recently, a conversation has emerged surrounding this issue as it pertains to individuals in the religious community. In the video titled "Muslims DOX Me, GodLogic, & InspiringPhilosophy (Trying to End Us?)", the host shared distressing experiences involving doxxing incidents that affected not only him but also other prominent figures in the community. This brings to light the broader implications of personal safety and the ethics of engaging in debates on faith and theology online.In "Muslims DOX Me, GodLogic, & InspiringPhilosophy (Trying to End Us?)," the discussion revolves around the alarming trend of doxxing and its implications, prompting us to delve deeper into the issues that surround personal safety and ethical engagement in faith discussions. The Personal Impact of Online Attacks For believers and skeptics alike, the personal impacts of online attacks can be devastating. In the video, the host recounts how his wife and home address were exposed as a result of doxxing by someone known as Maleek the Dawah Snitch. This not only endangers their physical safety but also serves as an anxiety-inducing reminder of the hostility that can permeate discussions about faith. The ripple effects of such actions extend beyond personal safety; they can lead to a chilling effect on open dialogue about critical theological and ideological matters. The Fine Line Between Advocacy and Harassment While advocating for one’s beliefs is essential to religious discourse, the lines can sometimes blur into harassment. The host, alongside Thaddeus and Chris, discusses the nuances of standing firm in one’s faith while facing hostility. This conversation needs to resonate within our communities, encouraging thoughtful engagement rather than animosity. When discussing faith, how do we ensure that we are maintaining integrity in our interactions? The dangers of conflating dissent with personal attack must be addressed in our approach to apologetics. Fostering Respectful Dialogue in Religious Debates Respectful dialogue in religious contexts is pivotal, particularly in an era where discussions often escalate into personal attacks and vitriolic disputes. As believers, we must reflect on how we engage with others, particularly those from other faiths. What strategies can effectively foster this respect? Encouraging a culture of mutual understanding rather than condescension while addressing questions about faith can go a long way in maintaining integrity during debates. Strategies such as active listening and empathetic responses could transform heated discussions into constructive dialogues. Reflections for Young Believers and Skeptics Youth and college students often find themselves navigating faith discussions both online and offline. In light of this doxxing incident, how should young believers or skeptics approach theological debates? It might be crucial for educators and mentors to provide tools for safe engagement. This involves understanding the potential risks of public discussions and ensuring practices that prioritize community safety while fostering growth. An environment that encourages questions and honest exploration of beliefs can empower young minds to engage without fear of retaliation. Resilience in Faith and Community The challenge posed by doxxing and hostility towards public figures serves as a reminder for faith communities to advance resilience. The discussion in the video encourages believers to be vigilant yet assuring in their faith journey. Communities must band together to support one another in the face of adversity. By doing so, individuals can find strength in their collective experiences, making them more resilient to online harassment. How can local churches foster this communal support? Establishing stronger ties and ensuring that individual voices are heard can enhance the community's protective measures. Conclusion: Responding Wisely The conversation sparked by the doxxing incidents discussed in "Muslims DOX Me, GodLogic, & InspiringPhilosophy (Trying to End Us?)" offers important insights into navigating faith under attack. As believers and skeptics engage in discussions, prioritizing respectful dialogue, communal resilience, and personal safety must remain at the forefront. We invite readers to reflect on their roles within this conversation, championing values that encourage healthy discourse in the face of adversity. As we navigate these challenging waters, let us promote understanding and respect for diverse beliefs. If you feel inspired to contribute to a more respectful discussion environment in religious contexts, consider sharing these insights with your community or participating in local dialogues that focus on understanding and mutual respect.

01.18.2026

Interracial Marriage Debate: Biblical Foundations and Cultural Insights

Update Understanding the Resurgence of the Interracial Marriage Debate The topic of interracial marriage recently re-emerged, shedding light on the evolving cultural dynamics surrounding marriage and identity. A debate hosted by leading figures Ruslan and GodLogic on one side, and Webbon, Griffith, and Todd on the other, highlights the complexities and varying viewpoints on this sensitive issue. What does this continuing dialogue indicate about our society today? How does it intersect with biblical teachings and the transformative nature of love across racial lines?In 'The Interracial Marriage Debate is Back | My Response', the discussion dives into recent intense debates uncovering varying viewpoints on this critical cultural topic. The Bible’s Perspective on Marriage When examining the issue of interracial marriage, it is essential to consult the Bible, which offers insights into God’s design for unity among all people. Biblical texts often emphasize the principles of love, commitment, and respect above ethnic differences. For instance, Galatians 3:28 declares, “There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” This emphasizes a core Christian belief that in Christ, cultural and racial distinctions should not divide us. What Historical Context Influences Today’s Debate? Historically, the conversation surrounding interracial marriage has been fraught with challenges, particularly in contexts where social norms dictated rigid racial boundaries. As societal acceptance expanded, particularly in Western cultures, interracial marriages began to flourish, yet prejudices and antagonism can still resurface. Understanding these historical contexts is vital to navigating current discussions effectively. Exploring Cultural Critiques and Counterarguments Critics of interracial marriage often bring up concerns about cultural identity and familial harmony. They argue that such marriages can dilute cultural heritage or lead to conflicts within families. However, many advocates highlight the enriching experiences that come from blending different cultures and traditions within families. As society progresses, the definition of unity grows more expansive, allowing individuals to create newfound relationships that challenge outdated norms. Future Predictions: A More Inclusive Society? As we look ahead, it becomes crucial to consider the potential pathways for a more inclusive society. The ongoing debates could lead to more dialogues, educational resources, and community-building initiatives aimed at fostering understanding and acceptance. With younger generations, especially youth and college students, becoming increasingly open to diverse relationships, we may anticipate a gradual normalization of interracial unions in the broader cultural narrative. Encouraging Conversations Around the Dinner Table For parents and church leaders, the current dialogue serves as an excellent opportunity to discuss love and acceptance in families and faith communities. Engaging youth in conversations on the significance of inclusivity and understanding can empower them to foster environments where diversity is celebrated. This will not only strengthen these young individuals' faith but also deepen their awareness of cultural implications in modern relationships. The video we analyzed, The Interracial Marriage Debate is Back | My Response, presents insights into this ongoing issue, sparking important conversations that encourage us to reflect on our own beliefs and assumptions regarding marriage and relationships. The discussions highlighted in the debate challenge us to consider what biblical teachings say about acceptance and unity among all believers. This topic is particularly relevant as many grapple with issues of identity and belonging in today’s world. Whether we are believers seeking to strengthen our faith, skeptics exploring theological perspectives, or simply curious about cultural dynamics, the integration of varied viewpoints around interracial marriage opens doors for meaningful discourse. As we continue exploring these themes, it’s important to embrace dialogues around love, acceptance, and the scriptural foundation that supports unity among diverse backgrounds. Engaging with this material could also encourage active participation in faith communities and foster healthier relational dynamics.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*