Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update

Biblical Living Unlocked

Logo - Biblical living unlocked
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Biblical Parenting
    • Parenting Tips
    • Family Fellowship
    • Bible Teaching
    • Apologetics
    • Community Stories
    • Youth Focus
    • International
    • Walton Evangelical Church
    • Salt Church Mar Menor
    • Salt Church Los Montesinos
    • John Piper
    • News & Offers
Add Element
  • Ken on Facebook
    update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
4 Minutes Read

The Real History of Penal Substitutionary Atonement

How Does Jesus Save Us? Understanding Penal Substitutionary Atonement

By Mike Winger, Simplified and Explained


Introduction: What Did Jesus Do on the Cross?

At the very heart of Christianity is a big question: how does Jesus save us? One way Christians have explained this is through something called Penal Substitutionary Atonement (PSA). That’s a mouthful, but it simply means this:

Jesus took our punishment so we could be forgiven and brought back to God.

This idea is not new. It’s been around since the early days of the Church and is taught clearly in the Bible.

What Does Penal Substitutionary Atonement Mean?

Let’s break it down into three simple parts:

• Penal – This comes from the word penalty. Because of sin, humans deserve a penalty. The Bible says, “The soul that sins shall die” (Ezekiel 18:20). Sin leads to separation from God and death.

• Substitutionary – This means Jesus took our place. He didn’t just die – He died for us. Like it says in Isaiah 53:5, “He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities.”

• Atonement – Atonement means to make things right between us and God. Through Jesus’s sacrifice, we are forgiven and made right with God (Romans 5:10).

So, put together: Jesus took the punishment we deserve (penal), in our place (substitution), to bring us back to God (atonement).

Why Do Some People Disagree?

Some modern teachers say PSA is a new idea that started only 500 years ago with a man named John Calvin. They argue that the early church didn’t believe this, and that PSA is based on legal thinking, not love.

But Pastor Mike Winger strongly disagrees. He believes that many early church leaders clearly taught that Jesus took the punishment for our sins.

Let’s look at what some of them said.

What Did Early Christians Believe?

Clement of Rome (c. 95 AD)

“Jesus Christ our Lord gave his blood for us… his body for our bodies, and his soul for our souls.”

This clearly shows substitution – Jesus gave Himself in our place.

Ignatius (c. 107 AD)

“He suffered all these things for our sakes that we might be saved.”

Jesus suffered so that we could be saved – that’s penalty and substitution.

Epistle of Barnabas (c. 70–135 AD)

This early Christian writing quotes Isaiah 53, which talks about the suffering servant taking the punishment for others’ sins.

“He was wounded for our transgressions… and with His stripes we are healed.”

The Epistle to Diognetus (2nd century)

“The righteous one for the unrighteous… Oh sweet exchange!”

This describes the beautiful exchange – Jesus took our place so we could be free.

Justin Martyr (c. 100–165 AD)

“The Father… wished his Christ to take upon himself the curses of all.”

Jesus took on the curse (the penalty) so we could be forgiven.


Isn’t There Another View? What About Christus Victor?

Yes, another way people understand the cross is called Christus Victor, which means “Christ the Victor.” This view says that Jesus defeated sin, death, and the devil.

But here’s the thing: Christus Victor and Penal Substitution are not enemies. They go hand in hand.

• PSA explains how Jesus won the victory (by taking our place).

• Christus Victor explains what the result was (Jesus defeated sin and death).

As Pastor Mike says, “They are sisters, not rivals.”


Does the Bible Support PSA?

Absolutely. The Bible is full of verses that teach penal substitution. Here are a few:

• Isaiah 53:5–6 – “The punishment that brought us peace was on him… the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all.”

• 2 Corinthians 5:21 – “God made him who had no sin to be sin for us.”

• Galatians 3:13 – “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us.”

• 1 Peter 2:24 – “He himself bore our sins in his body on the cross.”

These verses clearly show Jesus took our punishment to make us right with God.


Was God Angry at Jesus?

Some people say PSA makes it sound like God was cruel – even calling it “cosmic child abuse.” But this is a misunderstanding.

Here’s the truth: God was not punishing someone else. God Himself – in the person of Jesus – came to take our place. Jesus said, “No one takes my life from me, but I lay it down of my own accord” (John 10:18).

So, Jesus wasn’t a victim. He willingly gave Himself to save us. “But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8).


Conclusion: Why It Matters

Penal Substitutionary Atonement shows us two important things:

1. God is holy and just – He does not ignore sin.

2. God is loving and merciful – He took the punishment Himself so we could be saved.

This isn’t a cold, legal idea. It’s the glorious good news of the gospel. It’s about how Jesus saves us by giving His life for ours.


Final Thought

If you ever doubt how much God loves you, just look at the cross. As it says in Isaiah 53:10, “Yet it was the Lord’s will to crush him and cause him to suffer… and the will of the Lord will prosper in his hand.”

God was pleased – not because of the pain – but because Jesus’s death would bring salvation, healing, and new life to anyone who believes.


That’s the heart of Christianity. And that’s why the cross changes everything.


Apologetics

17 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
02.06.2026

Unlocking the Biblical Significance of Ishmael: Insights from Abraham Fulfilled

Update Exploring the Dawah Book’s Insights on Ishmael and Arabia The book “Abraham Fulfilled: A Biblical Study of God’s Plan for Ishmael and Arabia” offers a compelling framework for understanding complex biblical narratives through the lens of Islamic traditions. This exploration dives deep into the connections and theological implications of Ishmael's role in biblical history, an area often misunderstood or overlooked in Christian theology.In 'Best Case for Muhammad in the Bible?', the discussion dives into Ishmael's biblical portrayal, exploring key insights that sparked deeper analysis on our end. Why This Discussion Matters As believers and seekers navigate the complexities of faith, understanding different perspectives becomes essential. The dawah efforts, particularly those based on a biblical study, invite Christians and non-Christians alike to explore their scriptures and the historical intertwining of the Abrahamic faiths. This knowledge can bolster one’s faith, challenge assumptions, and foster dialogue among believers and skeptics. Historical Context of Ishmael In the Bible, Ishmael is often seen through the prism of familial conflict, representing the tensions between Isaac and the line of Abraham. However, historical analysis reveals that Ishmael’s story is integral to the narrative of God's promises and is tied intricately with the understanding of Arabia and the Arab people. Exploring this context allows readers to appreciate the role of Ishmael not just as an outcast, but as a part of a divine plan. Parallel Examples In Scripture To better grasp the significance of Ishmael, consider the biblical stories of reconciliation. Take Joseph and his brothers, for instance; their journey from conflict to forgiveness serves as a powerful parallel. Similarly, the narrative of Ishmael intertwines with themes of unity and reconciliation in broader Abrahamic tradition. Future Insights: Dialogue Across Faiths The trajectory of interfaith dialogue is not only necessary but also promising. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, understanding and discussing how figures like Ishmael are perceived across different religions can foster respect and understanding. By acknowledging each faith's historical narratives, individuals can discover shared beliefs and common ground. Addressing Common Misconceptions Misinterpretations surrounding Ishmael often stem from traditional teachings that lack historical and cultural context. It is essential to recognize that the stories told throughout religious texts are not just historical accounts but are deeply intertwined with socio-political narratives of different eras. Understanding this can help break down bias and stereotypes. Practical Insights for Believers and Skeptics Those engaged in faith discussions can greatly benefit from knowing how to thoughtfully approach these topics. Reading across traditions and engaging with materials like “Abraham Fulfilled” can provide new perspectives that challenge conventional understandings and promote critical thinking - essential tools for robust faith development. How This Relates to Today’s Community The exploration of Ishmael’s legacy is not just an academic exercise; it has practical implications for today’s community dialogues. By enhancing our understanding of biblical characters through diverse perspectives, whether in educational settings or ministry work, individuals can contribute to a more inclusive conversation about faith in today’s pluralistic society. Inspirational Call to Bridge Gaps As laypeople, scholars, and leaders engage with texts like “Abraham Fulfilled,” they emerge with insights that can inspire their communities to bridge gaps between faiths. Understanding Ishmael's biblical portrayal motivates individuals to see the richness in their faiths and the importance of dialogue beyond differences. In a time where divisiveness is prevalent, exploring narratives that illuminate our shared heritage as Abrahamic faiths can draw communities closer together.

02.06.2026

Exploring Bryce Crawford’s Insights on the Bible and Racism: A Call to Action for Believers

Update The Intersection of Faith and Race: A Relevant Discussion In our current society, conversations about faith and race have taken on a greater urgency. Many people, including believers from various backgrounds, are grappling with how biblical teachings inform our understanding of racism. Moreover, it is essential to understand that discussions surrounding these themes are not only critical for individual spiritual growth but also vital for community engagement and witness.In "Bryce Crawford on the Bible and Racism," the discussion dives into key insights related to faith and modern societal issues, prompting a deeper analysis of these critical themes. Historical Context: Understanding Racism Through a Biblical Lens Historically, certain interpretations of the Bible have been misused to justify racism and discrimination. However, a thorough examination of scripture reveals a much different narrative that calls believers to love their neighbors and promote unity. For example, notable passages like Galatians 3:28 remind us that in Christ, there is neither Jew nor Gentile, indicating that the Gospel transcends cultural boundaries. Engaging with this historical context helps reinforce the idea that true faith is about embracing diversity, not enforcing division. What Did Bryce Crawford Highlight? In the video featuring Bryce Crawford, he explores how scriptural teachings can inform contemporary discussions on race. His analysis underscores the importance of viewing others through the lens of compassion and understanding, encouraging believers to take an active stance against prejudice. By emphasizing a rooted faith in Christ as a source of hope and reconciliation, Crawford challenges viewers to rethink their responsibilities in tackling societal issues of racism. Why This Discussion Matters Addressing racism within faith communities is of utmost importance, especially for youth and college students who are actively shaping their beliefs. They may be increasingly sensitive to social injustices and are often looking for proactive ways to express their faith. Believers, educators, and church leaders must seize the opportunity to engage in these dialogues, providing clarity and creating spaces where diverse voices can be heard. Practical Insights: How to Foster Anti-Racism in Faith Communities To foster an environment that actively rejects racism, church leaders and ministry workers can implement inclusive practices. This might include: Hosting discussions or workshops that tackle difficult topics like racism and privilege. Encouraging congregational reading of literature that promotes understanding of different cultures and experiences. Highlighting scripture passages that focus on love, unity, and community. Creating outreach programs that support marginalized communities in their areas. By intentionally integrating these actions into church life, communities can create a culture of acceptance and love that reflects the teachings of Jesus. Counterarguments: Addressing Concerns Among Believers Some may argue that discussing racism detracts from the central messages of the gospel. However, it is vital to recognize that discussions on social justice are not about politicizing the faith; rather, they align closely with biblical values of justice and love for one’s neighbor. The prophetic tradition in both the Old and New Testaments calls believers to stand up against oppression. Recognizing the role of the church as a catalyst for change enables a faith that is both deeply spiritual and profoundly practical. Conclusion: Engaging with the Challenges Ahead Engaging with issues of race and faith is a complex challenge, but it is also an area filled with potential for spiritual growth and community transformation. This conversation is relevant for believers seeking to strengthen their faith, skeptics questioning their beliefs, and educators hoping to guide young individuals in understanding our shared humanity. As we reflect on Bryce Crawford's insights regarding the Bible and racism, let us commit ourselves to conversations that lead to actionable change and foster unity among all believers and seekers of truth.

02.05.2026

Are We Understanding Progress? The Hidden Dangers Explored

Update Unraveling the Cold War’s Most Intriguing Tactic In a time of tension and secrecy, the Cold War was marked by various covert operations aimed at undermining the adversary. One such event, highlighted by Glen Scrivener, reveals a clever tactic employed by the Russians that goes far beyond mere espionage. Instead, it presents a fascinating intersection of faith, ideology, and propaganda. This article seeks to unpack that intriguing connection, starting with the surprising revelation of how Biblical texts played a role in Cold War tactics.In This Statue Reveals the Hidden Dangers of 'Progress', the discussion dives into Cold War tactics that utilize faith as a tool, exploring key insights that sparked deeper analysis on our end. Why This Matters: The Spiritual Implications of Ideological Battles The revelation of hidden strategies employed during the Cold War raises important questions about the intersections of faith and politics. Consequently, how does the smuggling of ideological content through the lens of a sacred text influence contemporary beliefs? For believers, this gives new depth to the understanding of how their faith might be appropriated or misappropriated in public discourse and geopolitical struggles. It serves as a reminder for followers of Christ to critically engage with spiritual narratives and practices that permeate their lives. Historical Context: The Battle of Ideas The Cold War was not just a struggle of military might; it was fundamentally a battle of ideas. With the rise of global communism juxtaposed against Western capitalism and democracy, faith became a valuable tool. Glen Scrivener’s examination of this tactic reveals how faith can offer solace and strength yet simultaneously be manipulated for coercive purposes. The dialogue surrounding these events provides insight into how ideologies can shape, inform, or even skew one’s beliefs. The Role of Propaganda: A Biblical Framework When considering propaganda, we must grapple with how ideas are presented to the public. In this case, the Russians' method of intertwining a Biblical verse with ideological content is particularly noteworthy. The Bible, traditionally viewed as a source of morality and truth, is interlaced with messages that can be distorted. This duality underscores the need for critical thinking—they can either reinforce spiritual growth or lead to misconceptions about faith itself. Lessons for Modern Believers: Discerning Truth in Our Faith In a world where information is easily disseminated, the Cold War strategy reveals a modern concern: the possibility of misrepresentation within religious discourse. Believers today must navigate a landscape replete with varied interpretations and ideological spins. The challenge lies not just in discerning truth—it's also in understanding how messages align or misalign with the essence of Christian teaching. The lessons gleaned from historical events can resonate powerfully in personal faith journeys today. Future Perspectives: Looking Ahead to Global Ideological Conflicts As we venture further into our globalized society, it becomes crucial to consider future ideological conflicts and the role faith will play within them. How might current political narratives harness religious sentiments for material or strategic gains? This speculation evokes a call to action for believers to be vigilant stewards of their faith and to advocate for truth rather than manipulation. Understanding Culture: The Connection Between Faith and Society This analysis of Russian tactics during the Cold War intertwines not just historical context, but invites a broader reflection on cultural implications. For seekers, skeptics, and believers alike, this scenario poses an essential challenge: How can we engage with cultural narratives that seek to capture the divine while maintaining authenticity in our beliefs? Cultural critics and intellectuals must wrestle with these questions if the aim is to act responsibly within society. Exploring Glen Scrivener’s insights in This Statue Reveals the Hidden Dangers of 'Progress' not only sheds light on historical implications, but it also prompts an introspective examination of contemporary life. In doing so, we become tasked with not only distinguishing the spiritual from the political but actively contributing to a dialogue that fortifies our faith while engaging the world around us. As we reflect on these ideas, consider how you can engage more deeply with your faith—perhaps by digging into the rich narrative of scripture or discussing these complexities within your community. Opportunities abound for believers to grow and encourage others to navigate the complexities surrounding faith and ideology.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*