Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update

Biblical Living Unlocked

Logo - Biblical living unlocked
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Biblical Parenting
    • Parenting Tips
    • Family Fellowship
    • Bible Teaching
    • Apologetics
    • Community Stories
    • Youth Focus
    • International
    • Walton Evangelical Church
    • Salt Church Mar Menor
    • Salt Church Los Montesinos
    • John Piper
    • News & Offers
Add Element
  • Ken on Facebook
    update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
4 Minutes Read

The Real History of Penal Substitutionary Atonement

How Does Jesus Save Us? Understanding Penal Substitutionary Atonement

By Mike Winger, Simplified and Explained


Introduction: What Did Jesus Do on the Cross?

At the very heart of Christianity is a big question: how does Jesus save us? One way Christians have explained this is through something called Penal Substitutionary Atonement (PSA). That’s a mouthful, but it simply means this:

Jesus took our punishment so we could be forgiven and brought back to God.

This idea is not new. It’s been around since the early days of the Church and is taught clearly in the Bible.

What Does Penal Substitutionary Atonement Mean?

Let’s break it down into three simple parts:

• Penal – This comes from the word penalty. Because of sin, humans deserve a penalty. The Bible says, “The soul that sins shall die” (Ezekiel 18:20). Sin leads to separation from God and death.

• Substitutionary – This means Jesus took our place. He didn’t just die – He died for us. Like it says in Isaiah 53:5, “He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities.”

• Atonement – Atonement means to make things right between us and God. Through Jesus’s sacrifice, we are forgiven and made right with God (Romans 5:10).

So, put together: Jesus took the punishment we deserve (penal), in our place (substitution), to bring us back to God (atonement).

Why Do Some People Disagree?

Some modern teachers say PSA is a new idea that started only 500 years ago with a man named John Calvin. They argue that the early church didn’t believe this, and that PSA is based on legal thinking, not love.

But Pastor Mike Winger strongly disagrees. He believes that many early church leaders clearly taught that Jesus took the punishment for our sins.

Let’s look at what some of them said.

What Did Early Christians Believe?

Clement of Rome (c. 95 AD)

“Jesus Christ our Lord gave his blood for us… his body for our bodies, and his soul for our souls.”

This clearly shows substitution – Jesus gave Himself in our place.

Ignatius (c. 107 AD)

“He suffered all these things for our sakes that we might be saved.”

Jesus suffered so that we could be saved – that’s penalty and substitution.

Epistle of Barnabas (c. 70–135 AD)

This early Christian writing quotes Isaiah 53, which talks about the suffering servant taking the punishment for others’ sins.

“He was wounded for our transgressions… and with His stripes we are healed.”

The Epistle to Diognetus (2nd century)

“The righteous one for the unrighteous… Oh sweet exchange!”

This describes the beautiful exchange – Jesus took our place so we could be free.

Justin Martyr (c. 100–165 AD)

“The Father… wished his Christ to take upon himself the curses of all.”

Jesus took on the curse (the penalty) so we could be forgiven.


Isn’t There Another View? What About Christus Victor?

Yes, another way people understand the cross is called Christus Victor, which means “Christ the Victor.” This view says that Jesus defeated sin, death, and the devil.

But here’s the thing: Christus Victor and Penal Substitution are not enemies. They go hand in hand.

• PSA explains how Jesus won the victory (by taking our place).

• Christus Victor explains what the result was (Jesus defeated sin and death).

As Pastor Mike says, “They are sisters, not rivals.”


Does the Bible Support PSA?

Absolutely. The Bible is full of verses that teach penal substitution. Here are a few:

• Isaiah 53:5–6 – “The punishment that brought us peace was on him… the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all.”

• 2 Corinthians 5:21 – “God made him who had no sin to be sin for us.”

• Galatians 3:13 – “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us.”

• 1 Peter 2:24 – “He himself bore our sins in his body on the cross.”

These verses clearly show Jesus took our punishment to make us right with God.


Was God Angry at Jesus?

Some people say PSA makes it sound like God was cruel – even calling it “cosmic child abuse.” But this is a misunderstanding.

Here’s the truth: God was not punishing someone else. God Himself – in the person of Jesus – came to take our place. Jesus said, “No one takes my life from me, but I lay it down of my own accord” (John 10:18).

So, Jesus wasn’t a victim. He willingly gave Himself to save us. “But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8).


Conclusion: Why It Matters

Penal Substitutionary Atonement shows us two important things:

1. God is holy and just – He does not ignore sin.

2. God is loving and merciful – He took the punishment Himself so we could be saved.

This isn’t a cold, legal idea. It’s the glorious good news of the gospel. It’s about how Jesus saves us by giving His life for ours.


Final Thought

If you ever doubt how much God loves you, just look at the cross. As it says in Isaiah 53:10, “Yet it was the Lord’s will to crush him and cause him to suffer… and the will of the Lord will prosper in his hand.”

God was pleased – not because of the pain – but because Jesus’s death would bring salvation, healing, and new life to anyone who believes.


That’s the heart of Christianity. And that’s why the cross changes everything.


Apologetics

16 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
01.08.2026

Unraveling the Fascination with Near-Death Experiences: Insights for All

Update Examining Near-Death Experiences: Insights from the NY Times The New York Times often delves into intriguing topics, but its recent exploration of near-death experiences has stirred conversation among believers, skeptics, and seekers alike. This discussion not only touches on the mysterious intersections of faith, science, and personal experience, but also provokes deeper consideration of what lies beyond our earthly existence.In 'Near Death experiences in the NY Times?', the discussion dives into how personal journeys intersect with spirituality, exploring key insights that sparked deeper analysis on our end. The Appeal of Near-Death Experiences Near-death experiences (NDEs) fascinate many, presenting what many describe as transformative encounters with the divine or the afterlife. These accounts often share common themes—such as seeing a bright light, feeling a sense of peace, or experiencing a life review—that resonate deeply with those searching for meaning in life and what comes after. For believers, these experiences can reinforce faith, while skeptics might regard them as mere neurological phenomena. Nevertheless, what remains undeniable is their profound impact on those who undergo them. Historical Context of Near-Death Experiences The concept of NDEs isn't new; history shows that many cultures and religions have accounts of individuals who claimed to have encountered a realm beyond this life. For instance, in the early Christian texts, Paul’s vision of heaven (2 Corinthians 12:2-4) is often cited as an ancient example akin to modern NDE reports. This backdrop invites a thoughtful exploration of how our understanding of NDEs has evolved over time. Scientific Perspectives and Skeptical Views Skeptics posit that NDEs can be attributed to lack of oxygen in the brain or chemical reactions during critical health events. They challenge the interpretation of these experiences as spiritual phenomena, suggesting they are simply physiological responses. Nonetheless, the sheer number of similar accounts raises questions about whether there may be more at play—especially when individuals report verifiable details about events they couldn't have possibly known while clinically ‘dead.’ Personal Testimonies: Faith in Action Despite contrasting viewpoints, the personal testimonies of individuals who have experienced NDEs carry significant weight. Many report a newfound appreciation for life, an increased desire to connect with others, and profound shifts in values. These transformations speak volumes about the human experience and can serve as a platform for deeper discussions about the intersection of belief and experiential knowledge. Encouragement for Seekers and Skeptics As narratives around NDEs gain traction in mainstream media, they offer an opportunity for both seekers and skeptics to re-evaluate their perceptions of life, death, and faith. Whether viewed through a lens of skepticism or belief, these stories hold the potential to encourage open dialogue and reflection on deeply personal beliefs regarding existence beyond death. In doing so, they not only highlight the richness of human experience but also challenge each individual to ponder their own beliefs and values. Conclusion: Navigating the Conversation around NDEs As the discussion unfolds about near-death experiences in religions, in science, and even in personal narratives, there’s a valuable opportunity for collective growth. For parents and educators, encouraging youth to engage with these conversations can be formative. As we navigate these discussions, it becomes imperative to maintain a dialogue that respects differing perspectives—ultimately enabling us to understand each other better. If you’re interested in exploring how near-death experiences can impact faith and understanding of existence, consider fostering conversations within your community or joining a study group that tackles these complex topics.

01.07.2026

Engaging in the Islamic Dilemma: A Debate with Sheikh Uthman

Update The Clash of Beliefs: Faith Meets Debate As Christians, we’re called to engage with those who think differently than us, especially when it comes to discussing matters of faith. This Thursday, Sheikh Uthman Ibn Farooq will join David Wood for an insightful debate on 'The Islamic Dilemma.' Such discussions not only enhance our understanding but also challenge us to articulate our beliefs more clearly. The video Debate with Sheikh Uthman This Thursday! acts as a crucial platform for exploring these differences.In Debate with Sheikh Uthman This Thursday!, the discussion dives into contemporary interfaith dialogues, exploring key insights that sparked deeper analysis on our end. What Is the Islamic Dilemma? The term 'Islamic Dilemma' generally refers to various philosophical and theological challenges within Islam, particularly around the perceptions of its teachings, practices, and the broader implications of faith in contemporary society. Many Christians may wonder how these dilemmas play out in real life, and debates like the one on Thursday provide a window into those discussions. Historical Context: Understanding the Background Throughout history, religious debates have shed light on faith traditions and their contributions to society. This particular debate stems from a long tradition of discourse between Christians and Muslims. Engaging with such topics helps us understand not only our faith but also the foundations of others. Facing the Islamic Dilemma head-on requires a firm grasp of Islamic history and theology, which shapes the contemporary conversation. Why Engaging in Debate Matters Debating theological issues is not merely about winning an argument; it's an opportunity for deeper understanding. Recent trends show a growing interest among young people in both apologetics and interfaith dialogue. This is evident as youth and college students increasingly seek to explore their beliefs concerning others. By participating in these conversations, individuals strengthen their own faith while demonstrating respect for different perspectives. Emotional Responses: Engaging with Contrasting Views For many, engaging with contrasting beliefs can be daunting. However, it is important to approach these discussions with an open mind and heart, remembering that the goal is to understand, not just to convince. Parents and educators play a significant role in shaping how young people navigate these interactions. It’s essential to foster a climate of respectful discourse where questions are welcomed, and diverse opinions can be shared. Actionable Insights: How to Prepare for the Debate In anticipation of Thursday's event, here are a few steps you can take to prepare: Research Islamic Teachings: Familiarize yourself with key aspects of Islamic beliefs to appreciate the context of the debate. Reflect on Your Own Faith: Take time to think about your own beliefs and how they compare with others. Engage with Resources: Utilize books, podcasts, and articles that discuss the intersection between Christianity and Islam. These steps will not only equip you for the debate but also deepen your understanding of both faiths. Conclusion: Join the Conversation Debates like the one featuring Sheikh Uthman provide vital opportunities for education and reflection. In a society that often promotes division and misunderstanding, fostering dialogues can bridge gaps and cultivate respect. As you prepare for this event, consider your faith's strength in the face of questions and learning. Connect with this engaging opportunity this Thursday at 4pm ET. If you're interested in these important conversations, join us and explore how your understanding of faith can grow through thoughtful engagement with differing perspectives. Let’s embrace the opportunity to learn something new together!

01.07.2026

Scott Adams' Newfound Faith: A Catalyst for Cultural Conversations

Update Understanding Scott Adams' Recent Journey In the recent livestream featuring Scott Adams, the creator of the popular "Dilbert" cartoon, he engaged in a candid discussion about Christianity and his evolving perspective on faith. This revelation has sparked curiosity and dialogue among believers, skeptics, and the broader public alike. As a renowned voice in contemporary cultural commentary, Adams’s journey can serve as a springboard for discussions about faith and its relevance in today's society.In Did Dilbert Cartoonist Scott Adams Convert to Christianity?, the discussion revolves around Scott Adams' spiritual journey, and we are expanding on its broader implications. The Role of Personal Testimonies Personal testimonies hold substantial power in shaping perspectives on faith. Whether one is a believer or a skeptic, hearing someone articulate their spiritual journey can ignite reflections on their own beliefs. Adams’ open embrace of Christianity, following years of cultural critique, presents an opportunity for deeper conversations about faith's impact on personal identity. This narrative becomes particularly significant when considering the diverse audience it addresses, from believers seeking to strengthen their faith to skeptics questioning the relevance of religion in modern life. Faith in the Public Sphere The blending of Adams' artistic expression and newfound faith raises questions about the role of religion in public spaces. How do personal beliefs intersect with professional identity, especially when one's public persona has been defined by satire and critique? As Adams navigates this delicate balance, his experiences may encourage others to consider how their beliefs shape their actions and presentations in the public sphere. Future Predictions: Faith’s Cultural Relevance What does the increasing visibility of public figures discussing faith mean for future cultural conversations? As religious discourse becomes more mainstream again, we may see a resurgence of interest in theological discussions, particularly among youth and college students. This growing curiosity could provide fertile ground for ministries and educators to engage with the younger generations in an authentic and relevant way. Actions to Take with This Information For those intrigued by Adams’ journey, there are a variety of ways to deepen one’s understanding of Christianity. Engaging with educational platforms, such as online degrees in Bible studies and apologetics, can provide foundational knowledge. Furthermore, individuals can partake in local church discussions or community groups, fostering a space for dialogue and exploration of faith matters. Emotional and Human Interest Angles Ultimately, Adams' evolution serves as a reminder of the complexities of personal faith journeys. In a world where moral ambiguity often surfaces, stories of transformation can inspire hope and resilience in others. Whether one agrees or disagrees with his beliefs, the emotional weight of his story encourages individuals to embrace their own journeys and consider the diverse facets of faith in the public eye. In summary, the discussion surrounding Did Dilbert Cartoonist Scott Adams Convert to Christianity? raises significant questions about faith, identity, and cultural relevance. There is value in exploring how such narratives can inspire a deeper understanding of personal beliefs and encourage authentic conversations about spirituality in our lives. If you're interested in how personal narratives like Adams' shape faith discussions, consider pursuing further educational opportunities in theology or community engagements that focus on dialogue and exploration in faith.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*