Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update

Biblical Living Unlocked

Logo - Biblical living unlocked
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Biblical Parenting
    • Parenting Tips
    • Family Fellowship
    • Bible Teaching
    • Apologetics
    • Community Stories
    • Youth Focus
    • International
    • Walton Evangelical Church
    • Salt Church Mar Menor
    • Salt Church Los Montesinos
    • John Piper
    • News & Offers
Add Element
  • Ken on Facebook
    update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
4 Minutes Read

The Real History of Penal Substitutionary Atonement

How Does Jesus Save Us? Understanding Penal Substitutionary Atonement

By Mike Winger, Simplified and Explained


Introduction: What Did Jesus Do on the Cross?

At the very heart of Christianity is a big question: how does Jesus save us? One way Christians have explained this is through something called Penal Substitutionary Atonement (PSA). That’s a mouthful, but it simply means this:

Jesus took our punishment so we could be forgiven and brought back to God.

This idea is not new. It’s been around since the early days of the Church and is taught clearly in the Bible.

What Does Penal Substitutionary Atonement Mean?

Let’s break it down into three simple parts:

• Penal – This comes from the word penalty. Because of sin, humans deserve a penalty. The Bible says, “The soul that sins shall die” (Ezekiel 18:20). Sin leads to separation from God and death.

• Substitutionary – This means Jesus took our place. He didn’t just die – He died for us. Like it says in Isaiah 53:5, “He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities.”

• Atonement – Atonement means to make things right between us and God. Through Jesus’s sacrifice, we are forgiven and made right with God (Romans 5:10).

So, put together: Jesus took the punishment we deserve (penal), in our place (substitution), to bring us back to God (atonement).

Why Do Some People Disagree?

Some modern teachers say PSA is a new idea that started only 500 years ago with a man named John Calvin. They argue that the early church didn’t believe this, and that PSA is based on legal thinking, not love.

But Pastor Mike Winger strongly disagrees. He believes that many early church leaders clearly taught that Jesus took the punishment for our sins.

Let’s look at what some of them said.

What Did Early Christians Believe?

Clement of Rome (c. 95 AD)

“Jesus Christ our Lord gave his blood for us… his body for our bodies, and his soul for our souls.”

This clearly shows substitution – Jesus gave Himself in our place.

Ignatius (c. 107 AD)

“He suffered all these things for our sakes that we might be saved.”

Jesus suffered so that we could be saved – that’s penalty and substitution.

Epistle of Barnabas (c. 70–135 AD)

This early Christian writing quotes Isaiah 53, which talks about the suffering servant taking the punishment for others’ sins.

“He was wounded for our transgressions… and with His stripes we are healed.”

The Epistle to Diognetus (2nd century)

“The righteous one for the unrighteous… Oh sweet exchange!”

This describes the beautiful exchange – Jesus took our place so we could be free.

Justin Martyr (c. 100–165 AD)

“The Father… wished his Christ to take upon himself the curses of all.”

Jesus took on the curse (the penalty) so we could be forgiven.


Isn’t There Another View? What About Christus Victor?

Yes, another way people understand the cross is called Christus Victor, which means “Christ the Victor.” This view says that Jesus defeated sin, death, and the devil.

But here’s the thing: Christus Victor and Penal Substitution are not enemies. They go hand in hand.

• PSA explains how Jesus won the victory (by taking our place).

• Christus Victor explains what the result was (Jesus defeated sin and death).

As Pastor Mike says, “They are sisters, not rivals.”


Does the Bible Support PSA?

Absolutely. The Bible is full of verses that teach penal substitution. Here are a few:

• Isaiah 53:5–6 – “The punishment that brought us peace was on him… the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all.”

• 2 Corinthians 5:21 – “God made him who had no sin to be sin for us.”

• Galatians 3:13 – “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us.”

• 1 Peter 2:24 – “He himself bore our sins in his body on the cross.”

These verses clearly show Jesus took our punishment to make us right with God.


Was God Angry at Jesus?

Some people say PSA makes it sound like God was cruel – even calling it “cosmic child abuse.” But this is a misunderstanding.

Here’s the truth: God was not punishing someone else. God Himself – in the person of Jesus – came to take our place. Jesus said, “No one takes my life from me, but I lay it down of my own accord” (John 10:18).

So, Jesus wasn’t a victim. He willingly gave Himself to save us. “But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8).


Conclusion: Why It Matters

Penal Substitutionary Atonement shows us two important things:

1. God is holy and just – He does not ignore sin.

2. God is loving and merciful – He took the punishment Himself so we could be saved.

This isn’t a cold, legal idea. It’s the glorious good news of the gospel. It’s about how Jesus saves us by giving His life for ours.


Final Thought

If you ever doubt how much God loves you, just look at the cross. As it says in Isaiah 53:10, “Yet it was the Lord’s will to crush him and cause him to suffer… and the will of the Lord will prosper in his hand.”

God was pleased – not because of the pain – but because Jesus’s death would bring salvation, healing, and new life to anyone who believes.


That’s the heart of Christianity. And that’s why the cross changes everything.


Apologetics

17 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
01.25.2026

Engaging in Faith Conversations: Insights from DebateCon 7

Update The Importance of Engaging with Challenging Ideas In the pursuit of truth, engaging with challenging ideas is paramount. As believers, confronting different viewpoints fosters growth in understanding and strengthens one’s faith. This process is critical not only for personal growth but for community engagement as well. DebateCon 7, the event referenced in the video by David Wood, encourages such discussions, bringing together believers and skeptics alike in the exploration of pressing social and theological questions.In 'Before They 'Charlie Kirk' Me at DebateCon, I Did THIS!', the discussion highlights the importance of engaging with challenging ideas within faith, which prompted us to delve deeper into the insights surrounding this dynamic event. How DebateCon 7 Can Enhance Your Understanding Events like DebateCon serve as platforms to confront and discuss the complexities of modern faith and skepticism. By attending, individuals not only participate in the debate, but they also gain insights from various perspectives that challenge their assumptions. It’s an opportunity to hear firsthand accounts and arguments that may differ from one’s own understanding, allowing for a richer grasp of both personal beliefs and those of others. The Vital Role of Youth in Faith Discussions Youth and college students are often at the forefront of debating contemporary issues faced in society. Their involvement at DebateCon 7 is crucial—not only for their own spiritual growth but also to encourage a culture of open discussion within the church. A generation eager to explore doubts and questions is vital for the health of the church; they bring fresh ideas, energy, and enthusiasm that can inspire others. Perspectives of Cultural Critics and Intellectuals Cultural critics play a significant role by examining the various worldviews that shape society. By participating in debates, they bring a necessary critique of both secular and religious narratives. Their insights can reveal the implications of certain beliefs on culture and society, prompting deeper discussions around how faith interacts with contemporary issues. This discourse is essential for believers who want to apply their faith meaningfully in today’s world. Practical Theological Applications from DebateCon As attendees absorb the discussions at DebateCon, they should also reflect on practical theological applications. How can responses to opposing viewpoints inform their faith life and actions? This question is central to living out one's beliefs amid a plurality of opinions. Engaging with differing arguments does not aim to undermine faith; rather, it can solidify one’s convictions by understanding what truly matters in their beliefs. Counterarguments to Consider Every debate will have counterarguments. Addressing these thoughtfully helps one appreciate the breadth of perspectives involved. For instance, many skeptics argue that faith is ultimately blind and irrational. Engaging with such viewpoints provides believers with the chance to articulate why their faith is not merely a leap into the unknown, but a reasoned decision based on historical evidence. Taking the Next Step: How to Engage in Meaningful Discussions After witnessing or participating in debates, the next step is action. How can individuals actively engage in discussions within their own communities? Sharing insights gained from events like DebateCon can spark conversations at home, in churches, or on campuses. Encouraging dialogue rather than debate can foster a more profound understanding and respect for differing beliefs while maintaining one's convictions. The video, "Before They 'Charlie Kirk' Me at DebateCon, I Did THIS!" emphasizes the need for preparatory action before entering heated discussions. It reminds us that preparation involves not just knowledge of one's own position but also an understanding of opposing arguments. This preparation can lead to more fruitful dialogues where both believers and skeptics can learn from one another. In conclusion, engaging with ideas that challenge our beliefs is essential for a vigorous faith life, particularly in diverse discussions like those at DebateCon. It cultivates an environment where conviction meets curiosity, allowing both individuals and communities to grow together in truth. For those interested in participating in transformative events that promote intellectual discourse, attending DebateCon 7 can be a pivotal step. Whether you are a believer strengthening your faith or a skeptic seeking answers, this event invites you to explore and engage thoughtfully with the complexities of faith and culture.

01.25.2026

Exploring the Depths of Faith: Who Created God and Why This Matters

Update The Question of Origins: Who Created God? In seeking to address the question "Who created God?", we delve into one of the most profound inquiries that can shape our understanding of existence and divinity. While many believe God to be an eternal, uncreated being, exploring this question encourages a mix of theological reflection, philosophical thought, and a dialogue that can transcend cultural and ideological divides.In Who Created God? Is that even a good question?, the discussion dives into the complexity of existence and divinity, exploring key insights that sparked deeper analysis on our end. Theological Perspectives on Divine Origins In various religious traditions, it is often taught that God is eternal and uncaused, existing outside of time and space. For instance, in Christianity, God is described in the opening chapter of Genesis as the Creator of all things. Similarly, Islamic tradition emphasizes Allah's absolute oneness and eternal existence. This steadfast belief provides followers with a foundation for their faith and moral frameworks. Philosophical Approaches: The First Cause Argument Philosophically, the debate often gravitates towards the concept of the First Cause. Thinkers like Aristotle and later Thomas Aquinas posited that everything that exists must have a cause, leading to the conclusion that there must be an initial, uncaused cause—often identified as God. This line of reasoning serves to affirm God’s existence both within philosophical discourse and practical theology. Engaging with Skepticism: Challenging the Question To those less inclined to religious belief, the question can seem fraught with contradictions. Why would a creator need to be created? This skepticism invites robust dialogue and examination of underlying assumptions about existence, advocating for an intellectual embracing of uncertainty and doubt as critical elements of faith. Implications for Believers: Faith and Trust For believers wrestling with this question, it emerges as both a challenge and an opportunity to deepen one's faith. Such inquiries prompt individuals to reflect on their understanding of God's nature, ultimately aligning their perception with core doctrines of their faith traditions. It's a reminder that faith often coexists with questions rather than evading them. A Call to Open Dialogue: Unity in Diversity The inquiry surrounding the creation of God serves an essential role in theological discussions across various cultures. Encourage conversations, particularly among youths, as they navigate their beliefs and doubts. It is through dialogue that we can foster understanding and respect across differing beliefs, promoting a collective exploration of faith and spirituality. Facing the Unknown: What if the Question is Wrong? As we ponder this question, we must entertain the possibility that it may not be the right one. Instead of pondering who created God, should we focus on who God is—to us personally, relationally, and communally? Understanding God through personal experiences can reframe our relationship with the Divine, making faith more resonant and applicable amidst life’s uncertainties. In reflecting on Who Created God? Is that even a good question?, we uncover layers of complexity surrounding belief and existence. The exploration of this question invites further inquiry, connection, and earnest conversation between believers and seekers alike. It’s crucial that the faith community radiates a welcoming stance toward questions, encouraging open dialogue among all individuals, especially our youth. As we navigate our understanding of God, let's embrace the journey of questioning alongside seeking truth — guiding us toward deeper faith, community, and understanding in the shared experience of exploring the divine.

01.24.2026

Why Postponing My Bethel Update is an Opportunity for Deeper Reflection

Update The Journey Behind Sharing Faith Updates Kris Vallotton's recent decision to postpone his anticipated Bethel update has sparked interest and discussion within the community. This pause prompts us to reflect on the significance of transparency in church updates and the role of communication in building trust among congregants. When leaders like Vallotton choose to delay a message, it often conveys the importance of the content being shared. It urges followers to consider what deeper reasons might have influenced that decision—perhaps the need for clarity or a more meaningful experience for the audience.In 'Why I am postponing my Bethel update,' Kris Vallotton’s message raises significant insights about careful communication in ministry, prompting us to delve deeper into its meaning. Understanding the Context of Postponed Updates In ministry, the context and environment surrounding a message are paramount. Vallotton's postponement serves to remind us of the careful consideration that many church leaders take when approaching sensitive topics. This scenario illustrates the growing complexity of communicating faith-based content in a fast-paced digital world. As audiences, it invites us to consider our expectations as well. Are we as engaged in preparing for meaningful discussions as we are in consuming content? A Lesson in Patience and Anticipation In a culture that often prioritizes immediate gratification, the act of waiting can feel like a challenge. Vallotton's delay offers a teaching moment about patience in faith and the importance of expecting a well-prepared and prayerfully crafted message. This situation can inspire Christians to reflect on their spiritual journeys, encouraging them to embrace each step, rather than rushing to the end point. The community may discover that waiting may bring a more profound understanding of God’s timing. Communicating Through Uncertainty: A Biblical Perspective In times of uncertainty, it is essential that community leaders communicate clearly and transparently. Scriptures encourage us to be wise in our counsel and share in community experiences (Proverbs 15:22). Vallotton's postponement aligns with this biblical tenet, showcasing the idea that leaders should prioritize integrity over expediency. The dynamic of church communication is often reflective of the complexities present in both contemporary and historical contexts of faith. The Power of Anticipation in Faith Communities The anticipation of Vallotton's update may also be a reminder of the shared journey within faith communities. It invites congregants to engage in prayer and discussion about upcoming topics. This approach fosters a sense of unity and collective anticipation, as members prepare their hearts for what is to come. Just as the early church awaited the teachings of apostles, modern congregations can cultivate a similar spirit of expectancy and excitement. Encouraging Clear and Thoughtful Communication As Vallotton prepares to deliver his messaging once he is ready, there lies an opportunity for church leaders everywhere to model clear communication practices. Transparency can significantly strengthen congregational ties, fostering trust and understanding between leaders and their members. The church community is challenged to interact with these updates thoughtfully, allowing discussions to deepen their connection to meaningful decisions that arise from them. Conclusion: Embracing the Journey of Faith Together The decision to postpone the Bethel update reflects more than just a timing issue; it is about the quality of spiritual nourishment provided to communities. As members of the church, it is crucial to embrace this journey of faith together. By focusing on the process of waiting and anticipating spiritually enriching content, we not only grow closer to our leaders but also deepen our faith as individuals. Let us join together, engaging in earnest prayer and thoughtful discussions as we await Vallotton's upcoming insights.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*