Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update

Biblical Living Unlocked

Logo - Biblical living unlocked
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Biblical Parenting
    • Parenting Tips
    • Family Fellowship
    • Bible Teaching
    • Apologetics
    • Community Stories
    • Youth Focus
    • International
    • Walton Evangelical Church
    • Salt Church Mar Menor
    • Salt Church Los Montesinos
    • John Piper
    • News & Offers
Add Element
  • Ken on Facebook
    update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
4 Minutes Read

The Real History of Penal Substitutionary Atonement

How Does Jesus Save Us? Understanding Penal Substitutionary Atonement

By Mike Winger, Simplified and Explained


Introduction: What Did Jesus Do on the Cross?

At the very heart of Christianity is a big question: how does Jesus save us? One way Christians have explained this is through something called Penal Substitutionary Atonement (PSA). That’s a mouthful, but it simply means this:

Jesus took our punishment so we could be forgiven and brought back to God.

This idea is not new. It’s been around since the early days of the Church and is taught clearly in the Bible.

What Does Penal Substitutionary Atonement Mean?

Let’s break it down into three simple parts:

• Penal – This comes from the word penalty. Because of sin, humans deserve a penalty. The Bible says, “The soul that sins shall die” (Ezekiel 18:20). Sin leads to separation from God and death.

• Substitutionary – This means Jesus took our place. He didn’t just die – He died for us. Like it says in Isaiah 53:5, “He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities.”

• Atonement – Atonement means to make things right between us and God. Through Jesus’s sacrifice, we are forgiven and made right with God (Romans 5:10).

So, put together: Jesus took the punishment we deserve (penal), in our place (substitution), to bring us back to God (atonement).

Why Do Some People Disagree?

Some modern teachers say PSA is a new idea that started only 500 years ago with a man named John Calvin. They argue that the early church didn’t believe this, and that PSA is based on legal thinking, not love.

But Pastor Mike Winger strongly disagrees. He believes that many early church leaders clearly taught that Jesus took the punishment for our sins.

Let’s look at what some of them said.

What Did Early Christians Believe?

Clement of Rome (c. 95 AD)

“Jesus Christ our Lord gave his blood for us… his body for our bodies, and his soul for our souls.”

This clearly shows substitution – Jesus gave Himself in our place.

Ignatius (c. 107 AD)

“He suffered all these things for our sakes that we might be saved.”

Jesus suffered so that we could be saved – that’s penalty and substitution.

Epistle of Barnabas (c. 70–135 AD)

This early Christian writing quotes Isaiah 53, which talks about the suffering servant taking the punishment for others’ sins.

“He was wounded for our transgressions… and with His stripes we are healed.”

The Epistle to Diognetus (2nd century)

“The righteous one for the unrighteous… Oh sweet exchange!”

This describes the beautiful exchange – Jesus took our place so we could be free.

Justin Martyr (c. 100–165 AD)

“The Father… wished his Christ to take upon himself the curses of all.”

Jesus took on the curse (the penalty) so we could be forgiven.


Isn’t There Another View? What About Christus Victor?

Yes, another way people understand the cross is called Christus Victor, which means “Christ the Victor.” This view says that Jesus defeated sin, death, and the devil.

But here’s the thing: Christus Victor and Penal Substitution are not enemies. They go hand in hand.

• PSA explains how Jesus won the victory (by taking our place).

• Christus Victor explains what the result was (Jesus defeated sin and death).

As Pastor Mike says, “They are sisters, not rivals.”


Does the Bible Support PSA?

Absolutely. The Bible is full of verses that teach penal substitution. Here are a few:

• Isaiah 53:5–6 – “The punishment that brought us peace was on him… the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all.”

• 2 Corinthians 5:21 – “God made him who had no sin to be sin for us.”

• Galatians 3:13 – “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us.”

• 1 Peter 2:24 – “He himself bore our sins in his body on the cross.”

These verses clearly show Jesus took our punishment to make us right with God.


Was God Angry at Jesus?

Some people say PSA makes it sound like God was cruel – even calling it “cosmic child abuse.” But this is a misunderstanding.

Here’s the truth: God was not punishing someone else. God Himself – in the person of Jesus – came to take our place. Jesus said, “No one takes my life from me, but I lay it down of my own accord” (John 10:18).

So, Jesus wasn’t a victim. He willingly gave Himself to save us. “But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8).


Conclusion: Why It Matters

Penal Substitutionary Atonement shows us two important things:

1. God is holy and just – He does not ignore sin.

2. God is loving and merciful – He took the punishment Himself so we could be saved.

This isn’t a cold, legal idea. It’s the glorious good news of the gospel. It’s about how Jesus saves us by giving His life for ours.


Final Thought

If you ever doubt how much God loves you, just look at the cross. As it says in Isaiah 53:10, “Yet it was the Lord’s will to crush him and cause him to suffer… and the will of the Lord will prosper in his hand.”

God was pleased – not because of the pain – but because Jesus’s death would bring salvation, healing, and new life to anyone who believes.


That’s the heart of Christianity. And that’s why the cross changes everything.


Apologetics

18 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
02.11.2026

Revisiting Mohammed Hijab's Drunken TikTok Rant: A Call for Constructive Discourse

Update The Blind Spot of Public Discourse: Mohammed Hijab’s Viral Tirade In recent discussions, the provocative remarks made by Mohammed Hijab, particularly in his viral TikTok rant, have sparked a wave of dialogue within various communities. While originally aimed at critiquing aspects of cultural and religious intersections, the outburst has inadvertently brought forth critical reflections on both individual behavior and the broader implications on religious discourse.In Mohammed Hijab's Drunken TikTok Rant, the discussion dives into the complexities of public discourse within faith communities, sparking reflections that we’re expanding on in this article. Is It Time We Reassess Public Conduct in Digital Spaces? Hijab’s outburst raises essential questions regarding public conduct and the integrity of discourse in digital environments. Like many influential figures, Hijab carries significant responsibility; his words reverberate far beyond his immediate audience. This incident prompts believers and critics alike to reflect on the ways we communicate, especially on platforms that amplify our voices to millions. For faith communities, the challenge lies in embodying the values we espouse, fostering respectful dialogue even amidst disagreement. Dissecting the Roots of Frustration: What Lies Beneath? When examining Hijab's remarks, one cannot ignore the underlying frustration that often characterizes discourse around faith. Such rants frequently stem from a desire to defend one's identity and beliefs, especially in a landscape fraught with misunderstanding. Yet, employing shock tactics or inflammatory statements can ultimately alienate rather than engage. Understanding the source of this frustration invites deeper conversations about how various faith journeys are perceived, both by insiders and outsiders. Historical Context and the Evolution of Religious Discourse Historically, religious leaders and figures have often found themselves grappling with societal opposition. From the early church’s confrontations with prevailing Roman culture to today’s multi-faith societal dynamics, the challenges of articulating one's faith has continuously evolved. Hijab’s recent incident can be viewed within this long tradition of passionate advocacy. However, instead of garnering respect, the means of delivery risks undermining the message. This historical reflection calls for a renewed approach, one that prioritizes constructive dialogue. Counterarguments and Diverse Perspectives While many are quick to criticize Hijab’s approach, it's imperative to understand the diverse perspectives about public figures defending faith. Some argue that his passionate defense is indicative of an urgent need within marginalized communities to assert their beliefs boldly. While passion can be admirable, the methods employed must also be examined. The intersection of empathy and assertiveness is a delicate balance that can lead to more fruitful conversations without disdain for differing beliefs. Engaging Youth: The Key to Future Faith Conversations Youth and college students form a significant audience for hijab's message. As they navigate their own beliefs amidst a plethora of opinions, it becomes increasingly crucial for them to encounter meaningful exchanges. By dissecting incidents like Hijab's, a path toward understanding the implications of communication styles opens up. Teaching young believers to engage in respectful discourse can not only strengthen their convictions but also prepare them to encounter skepticism constructively. Strategies for Effective Religious Dialogues To foster dialogical engagement, it’s essential to consider strategies that prioritize respect and understanding. Educators and community leaders can play an influential role by incorporating courses around effective communication in religious contexts. Encouraging discussions that honor differing viewpoints enhances mutual respect and reduces the likelihood of conflict in conversations about faith. Taking Back the Narrative: Fostering Constructive Engagement In light of the heated exchange prompted by Hijab's rant, it’s essential for believers and skeptics alike to seize these moments as opportunities for growth. By challenging ourselves to engage actively in civil discourse, we reshape the narrative surrounding religion and public perception. By valuing education, empathetic listening, and respect, communities can cultivate a more inclusive environment. Conclusion: Moving Forward Together As we consider the lessons gleaned from Mohammed Hijab's outburst, it becomes clear that embracing compassion and constructive engagement can significantly transform conversations around faith. Whether you identify as a believer, skeptic, or seeker, taking time to reflect on one's approach to discourse can offer powerful insights into how we relate to one another. Together, we can foster an enriching dialogue that respects diverse perspectives and strengthens community bonds. Engage with us to explore further how we can create a more inclusive environment for faith-based discussions. Together, let's champion a discourse that seeks understanding and unity.

02.11.2026

Understanding When Fallen Christian Leaders Are Disqualified: Key Insights

Update The Importance of Integrity in Leadership In the realm of Christian leadership, integrity and accountability are paramount. When leaders fall into disqualification due to moral failure or doctrinal deviation, it raises serious questions about their ability to shepherd their communities. Such scenarios not only affect the leader's personal standing but also the faith and morale of their congregants.In the video titled 'When Are Fallen Christian Leaders Disqualified?', the vital discussion explores moral failings and their impact on church leaders, prompting us to analyze this critical issue further. Understanding Disqualification: What Does It Mean? Disqualification refers to circumstances under which a leader is seen as unfit to serve. This can stem from various issues such as scandals, abandonment of core theological beliefs, or personal misconduct. Understanding these disqualification parameters is essential for addressing the critical vulnerabilities leaders may face, allowing communities to approach the topic with grace, wisdom, and a plan for restoration. Parallel Examples: Recent Noteworthy Leaders Consider the recent examples of high-profile leaders who fell from grace. These cases often illustrate the consequences of neglecting one's ethical and spiritual responsibilities. When public figures, such as prominent pastors or theologians, encounter scandal, it reverberates throughout their congregations. Members often grapple with questions of trust and betrayal, making it crucial for churches to discuss accountability openly and constructively. Actionable Insights: How Churches Can Help Churches can take proactive steps to support their leaders and congregants alike. This includes establishing clear guidelines for ethical conduct, fostering an environment of open communication, and encouraging leaders to seek accountability from their peers. Regular training sessions on integrity and ethics can help create a culture that values responsibility and transparency. Recognizing that everyone fails, the community can provide avenues for restoration instead of alienation. Historical Context and Background: Lessons from the Past Throughout history, the church has seen its share of leaders disqualified due to ethical breaches. From early church figures to contemporary ministers, these moments offer critical lessons. By examining past failures and responses, today’s church can glean wisdom on how to prioritize character development and spiritual growth amongst its leaders. Future Predictions: Trends in Church Leadership Looking to the future, the need for authentic leadership will only grow. As culture shifts and societal pressures mount, church leaders will need to remain anchored in their values and open to accountability. Emerging training programs and resources focusing on emotional and spiritual health for leaders can help fortify communities against disqualification. In conclusion, the insights shared in the video “When Are Fallen Christian Leaders Disqualified?” serve as a reminder of the importance of integrity in church leadership. The discussion emphasizes the need for accountability, proactive community support, and ultimately, a path toward redemption for those who falter. As believers, a commitment to encouraging transparency starts at the grassroots level and reflects the broader Christian ethos of grace and restoration. As communities of faith navigate the complexities of leadership, we encourage church leaders and congregants alike to seek out resources that foster accountability and integrity. Investing in apologetics training and biblical education can empower our leaders to stand firm in their convictions. Check out available programs and courses that can help strengthen your church’s leadership today.

02.10.2026

Why Every Christian Should Respect the Quran: Insights from Naomi Armstrong

Update The Unexpected Defender: Naomi Armstrong’s Bold Stand for Faith In a polarized landscape of religious discourse, the recent video featuring Naomi Armstrong has ignited heated debates surrounding the treatment of the Quran within Christian contexts. As Armstrong articulates her defense of Maleek and Muslim beliefs, viewers are prompted to reflect on the implications of such discussions in a contemporary setting. This article explores Armstrong's statements and the wider consequences for interfaith dialogue and understanding.In "Weird Christian Lady BLASTS US for Being Mean to the Quran!", the discussion dives into the importance of respectful interfaith dialogue, leading us to explore vital insights that resonate with believers and skeptics alike. Context Matters: Understanding the Background of the Debate To fully grasp the nuances of Armstrong's arguments, it's essential to revisit the historical context of interactions between Christianity and Islam. Since their respective beginnings, the two faiths have coexisted, sometimes harmoniously, yet often with tension. Both religions share fundamental beliefs, and yet, interpretative divergences have fostered misunderstandings that spark debates like the one highlighted by Armstrong. The Quran is revered in Islam as the literal word of God, while Christians perceive the Bible as the foundation of their faith. By safeguarding the integrity of each text, believers can foster a dialogue rooted in respect and understanding rather than conflict. Armstrong’s passion for defending Maleek’s interpretation of the Quran invites a much-needed conversation about approaching sacred texts with sensitivity and appreciation. Faith and Respect: Why Armstrong’s Defense Matters Armstrong's assertion that Christians should approach the Quran with a spirit of respect is particularly relevant in today’s multicultural society. As individuals of various faiths engage more openly in discussions, her plea resonates with many, including believers and skeptics alike. It raises poignant questions about how we engage with and respect belief systems that differ from our own, particularly in educational spaces such as universities and community gatherings. The video underscores a vital principle: respect does not dilute one’s own faith. Rather, it enriches interfaith relationships and can lead to deeper understanding, which is paramount for today’s youth and college students navigating diverse beliefs. Bridging Divides: Lessons for the Next Generation For youth and college students who find themselves in a diverse environment, Armstrong’s message serves as a clarion call to embrace respectful dialogue about faith. The importance of creating inclusive spaces that promote openness cannot be overstated. When young people learn to engage with varying worldviews constructively, they develop critical thinking skills and empathy, which are invaluable in their personal and professional lives. Moreover, church leaders and educators have a unique opportunity to incorporate such discussions into their curricula. By equipping the next generation with tools to engage respectfully with others’ beliefs, we foster a culture of understanding that benefits everyone. Counterarguments: Perspectives Worth Considering While Armstrong’s defense is compelling, it’s essential to acknowledge the counterarguments presented by skeptics. Some individuals may reflect on the historical conflicts between religious groups and question whether sincere respect can exist amidst a backdrop of discord. Historical instances of religiously motivated violence and oppression contribute to the hesitance many feel toward interfaith dialogues. Incorporating diverse perspectives into this discourse can transform it from a one-sided conversation to a harmonious exchange that highlights learning opportunities and encourages emotional growth. As communities grapple with these complex feelings, healthy reflection and discussion can uncover pathways to healing and understanding. Strategies for Engaging with Religious Texts For those looking to engage thoughtfully with religious texts like the Quran and the Bible, Palmer’s insights provide a framework: be open-minded, seek understanding, and aim for respectful inquiry. Engaging with these texts isn’t about agreeing wholeheartedly on interpretations; rather, it’s about appreciating the historical and cultural context in which they were created. Believers of all faiths may benefit from engaging in interfaith book clubs or community dialogues. Such initiatives can cultivate deeper relationships between individuals of different beliefs while enriching one’s understanding of their own faith. Taking Action: How to Foster Respectful Dialogue Armstrong’s video has sparked interest not just in defending a religious text but in the broader issue of interfaith respect. To further promote this dialogue, we encourage readers to take actionable steps: initiate conversations within local community churches or online forums about interfaith respect, educate themselves about different beliefs, and cultivate environments where diverse opinions can be shared and respected. By actively participating in these dialogues, believers and seekers alike can contribute to a more inclusive and understanding world. Moreover, parents can encourage their children to ask questions, engage in discussions, and seek understanding around differing faith narratives. Conclusion: The Path Forward As we navigate the complexities of interfaith dialogues, we must recognize the importance of voices like Naomi Armstrong’s that implore us to engage with respect and understanding. While the road ahead may be fraught with challenges, collectively striving towards empathy allows us all to contribute to a harmonious coexistence amid diversity. Whether you are a church leader, educator, or a youth seeking knowledge, remember the importance of respectful engagement—a value essential to fostering a more inclusive world. Join us in this vital discussion as we collectively strive for understanding and respect across belief systems. Share your thoughts and experiences; together, let’s make strides towards meaningful conversations that can shift perspectives and foster unity.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*