Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update

Biblical Living Unlocked

Logo - Biblical living unlocked
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Biblical Parenting
    • Parenting Tips
    • Family Fellowship
    • Bible Teaching
    • Apologetics
    • Community Stories
    • Youth Focus
    • International
    • Walton Evangelical Church
    • Salt Church Mar Menor
    • Salt Church Los Montesinos
    • John Piper
Add Element
  • Ken on Facebook
    update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
4 Minutes Read

The Real History of Penal Substitutionary Atonement

How Does Jesus Save Us? Understanding Penal Substitutionary Atonement

By Mike Winger, Simplified and Explained


Introduction: What Did Jesus Do on the Cross?

At the very heart of Christianity is a big question: how does Jesus save us? One way Christians have explained this is through something called Penal Substitutionary Atonement (PSA). That’s a mouthful, but it simply means this:

Jesus took our punishment so we could be forgiven and brought back to God.

This idea is not new. It’s been around since the early days of the Church and is taught clearly in the Bible.

What Does Penal Substitutionary Atonement Mean?

Let’s break it down into three simple parts:

• Penal – This comes from the word penalty. Because of sin, humans deserve a penalty. The Bible says, “The soul that sins shall die” (Ezekiel 18:20). Sin leads to separation from God and death.

• Substitutionary – This means Jesus took our place. He didn’t just die – He died for us. Like it says in Isaiah 53:5, “He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities.”

• Atonement – Atonement means to make things right between us and God. Through Jesus’s sacrifice, we are forgiven and made right with God (Romans 5:10).

So, put together: Jesus took the punishment we deserve (penal), in our place (substitution), to bring us back to God (atonement).

Why Do Some People Disagree?

Some modern teachers say PSA is a new idea that started only 500 years ago with a man named John Calvin. They argue that the early church didn’t believe this, and that PSA is based on legal thinking, not love.

But Pastor Mike Winger strongly disagrees. He believes that many early church leaders clearly taught that Jesus took the punishment for our sins.

Let’s look at what some of them said.

What Did Early Christians Believe?

Clement of Rome (c. 95 AD)

“Jesus Christ our Lord gave his blood for us… his body for our bodies, and his soul for our souls.”

This clearly shows substitution – Jesus gave Himself in our place.

Ignatius (c. 107 AD)

“He suffered all these things for our sakes that we might be saved.”

Jesus suffered so that we could be saved – that’s penalty and substitution.

Epistle of Barnabas (c. 70–135 AD)

This early Christian writing quotes Isaiah 53, which talks about the suffering servant taking the punishment for others’ sins.

“He was wounded for our transgressions… and with His stripes we are healed.”

The Epistle to Diognetus (2nd century)

“The righteous one for the unrighteous… Oh sweet exchange!”

This describes the beautiful exchange – Jesus took our place so we could be free.

Justin Martyr (c. 100–165 AD)

“The Father… wished his Christ to take upon himself the curses of all.”

Jesus took on the curse (the penalty) so we could be forgiven.


Isn’t There Another View? What About Christus Victor?

Yes, another way people understand the cross is called Christus Victor, which means “Christ the Victor.” This view says that Jesus defeated sin, death, and the devil.

But here’s the thing: Christus Victor and Penal Substitution are not enemies. They go hand in hand.

• PSA explains how Jesus won the victory (by taking our place).

• Christus Victor explains what the result was (Jesus defeated sin and death).

As Pastor Mike says, “They are sisters, not rivals.”


Does the Bible Support PSA?

Absolutely. The Bible is full of verses that teach penal substitution. Here are a few:

• Isaiah 53:5–6 – “The punishment that brought us peace was on him… the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all.”

• 2 Corinthians 5:21 – “God made him who had no sin to be sin for us.”

• Galatians 3:13 – “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us.”

• 1 Peter 2:24 – “He himself bore our sins in his body on the cross.”

These verses clearly show Jesus took our punishment to make us right with God.


Was God Angry at Jesus?

Some people say PSA makes it sound like God was cruel – even calling it “cosmic child abuse.” But this is a misunderstanding.

Here’s the truth: God was not punishing someone else. God Himself – in the person of Jesus – came to take our place. Jesus said, “No one takes my life from me, but I lay it down of my own accord” (John 10:18).

So, Jesus wasn’t a victim. He willingly gave Himself to save us. “But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8).


Conclusion: Why It Matters

Penal Substitutionary Atonement shows us two important things:

1. God is holy and just – He does not ignore sin.

2. God is loving and merciful – He took the punishment Himself so we could be saved.

This isn’t a cold, legal idea. It’s the glorious good news of the gospel. It’s about how Jesus saves us by giving His life for ours.


Final Thought

If you ever doubt how much God loves you, just look at the cross. As it says in Isaiah 53:10, “Yet it was the Lord’s will to crush him and cause him to suffer… and the will of the Lord will prosper in his hand.”

God was pleased – not because of the pain – but because Jesus’s death would bring salvation, healing, and new life to anyone who believes.


That’s the heart of Christianity. And that’s why the cross changes everything.


Apologetics

11 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
09.16.2025

Excavating Colasse: What Archaeology Could Reveal About Colossians

Update Unlocking the Secrets of Colasse: What Archaeology May Reveal For centuries, the ancient city of Colasse has remained largely untouched. With its biblical significance as the recipient of Paul's letters in the New Testament, the recent commencement of excavations has illuminated a new path for understanding this historical site. This excavation is not merely an academic pursuit; it holds deep spiritual and historical meaning for believers and seekers alike.In 'Excavated at Last! What Archaeology Could Reveal About Colossians,' the discussion dives into the fascinating excavation of Colasse, exploring key insights that sparked deeper analysis on our end. The Significance of Colasse Located in modern-day Turkey, approximately 100 miles east of Ephesus, Colasse was a city mentioned in two key biblical letters—the letter to the Colossians and Philemon. Its reclamation through archaeological efforts provides a remarkable opportunity: not only can we delve into the roots of Christian thought but also enhance our understanding of the broader Mediterranean world during the first century. What Lies Beneath: Historical Context of Colasse Colasse, much like other cities in the region, was once a thriving center with both Hellenistic and Jewish influences. By the time of Paul, it had begun to diminish in prominence compared to neighboring cities like Laodicea. Exploring its remains enables researchers to uncover not just architectural remnants, but also the cultural, religious, and philosophical dynamics of a burgeoning Christian community facing challenges such as the Colossian heresy—a blend of early Christian beliefs challenged by false teachings. Excavation Insights: What Can We Expect to Find? The excavation, led by seasoned archaeologist Dr. Baris Yainer and his team, aims to reveal insights about life in Colasse. Utilizing ground-penetrating radar has already pinpointed potential sites for significant discoveries, including temples and public buildings. The team has commenced work in the necropolis, hoping to uncover graves that could yield inscriptions and artifacts revealing the religious practices and daily life of the inhabitants. Lessons from History: The Colossian Heresy One of the intriguing aspects of Colasse's archaeological excavation is its potential to shed light on the Colossian heresy. Scholars speculate that early Christians grappled with various philosophical and spiritual influences, including angel worship and ascetic practices, which Paul addresses in his letters. Insights gained from physical evidence such as inscriptions could help demystify the beliefs that shaped the early Church and enhanced Paul’s teachings. Challenges and Opportunities Ahead The process of excavating Colasse is richly layered with obstacles—from long bureaucratic approvals to securing funding for such endeavors. Despite these challenges, the excitement is palpable. With enough funding, the project can become a year-round initiative, enabling the team to uncover the city by digging systematically across the site. Each artifact discovered can potentially reshape our understanding of the biblical text that references this once-bustling community. The Broader Implications: Why Should We Care? Understanding Colasse matters beyond merely piecing together history. As believers, it reinforces faith by connecting us with the early Church's struggles and triumphs. For skeptics and seekers, it presents an opportunity to explore the historical validity of religious texts, fostering dialogues around culture and spirituality that transcend generations. How You Can Get Involved If you feel compelled to support this historical undertaking or simply wish to follow along, you can email colassi.excavation@gmail.com for updates and information. Every bit of support helps ensure that this once-in-a-lifetime excavation can continue unhindered, enriching our collective understanding of faith and history.

09.16.2025

The Awakening of Faith Post-Charlie Kirk: A Cultural Reflection

Update Awakening the Spirit: The Impact of Charlie Kirk's Life and Death In a world increasingly shaped by political discourse, the recent death of Charlie Kirk has ignited more than just a conversation around his views—it has sparked a profound spiritual response among many. As public figures fall, their legacies often force us to reflect not just on their ideals but on our own beliefs and life choices.In 'They Tried Church Because of Charlie Kirk — What Will Keep Them?', the discussion dives into the shared spiritual awakenings following his death, exploring key insights that sparked a deeper analysis on our end. Understanding the Emergence of Faith The emotional tributes flowing from followers paint a picture of individuals re-evaluating their core beliefs. From taking a Bible in hand for the first time in years to attending church services en masse, people are feeling spiritually stirred in ways they may not have anticipated. One poignant testimony stated, "I prayed for the first time in over 23 years... it felt important in this moment." These spiritual awakenings reflect a growing yearning for connection and community amidst chaotic times. The Distinction Between Good and Evil Many people have echoed a newly awakened perception of good and evil, familiar yet alien in its intensity. Numerous comments reveal that the tragedy surrounding Kirk’s death has pressed individuals to confront their past choices, illuminating the contrast between their values and prevalent societal trends. As articulately noted by one individual who began questioning her lifestyle choices post-Kirk's passing, "I see good and evil, and I am willing to believe in goodness with a capital G." This clarifying moment strengthens arguments for faith-based community involvement. The Role of Community in Faith's Revival Community gatherings are often at the heart of faith revival. For those who have strayed from organized religion, the call to rediscover communal worship resonates deeply, with many citing a need for support and belonging as they navigate personal and collective crises. Consider how many expressed thoughts of attendance at church not merely as an act of faith but as an opportunity for solidarity, a space to connect beyond political affiliations. One person remarked, "I felt a pull back towards my Catholic faith... it no longer feels political. It feels far deeper." Such insights hint at the multilayered motivations people have for returning to church, driven not just by a desire for spirituality but also for connection. Church Attendance Amid Political Discontent Kirk's political background naturally raises questions about the intertwining of faith and political identity. There lies tension in interpreting the influx of attendees at church as a simple response to a traumatic event. As Ryan Burge points out, historical trends suggest that while specific incidents can spur increased attendance, they often lack lasting impact. Yet, some still feel compelled to explore faith in these moments of societal turbulence. This prompts an important discussion on how church leaders can welcome non-traditional attendees—those who arrive not due to a spiritual calling, but rather out of a political crisis or a personal tragedy. Meeting People Where They Are A compelling observation is that despite mixed motives, newcomers are searching for something deeper than political alignment—an encounter with faith and God. When dealing with this complex intersection of belief and political ideology, church communities must strive to enrich dialogues centered on Christ, rather than simply accommodating surface-level co-option of faith for political ends. Many attendees confess their initial presence in church may not be centered around church worship itself, yet the crucial opportunity remains to guide them toward true spiritual awakening. Rethinking the Perspective Turning to the biblical narrative that emphasizes transformation, people have the chance to reshape their identities and address the underlying issues that lead to feelings of isolation or disillusionment with faith. When people share experiences like returning to church after years of absence or questioning their previously held beliefs, it invites a collective reflection on the depth of Christ's calling. The thought that Kirk's death resonates with the legacy of good triumphing over evil promotes a more thoughtful engagement with faith. Bringing that narrative full circle, we can consider how Charlie Kirk himself exemplified a life dedicated to courage in faith. Embracing the Opportunity for Change This moment presents a unique chance for church leaders and communities to guide those who have recently awakened to faith back towards profound spiritual exploration. The burgeoning response to Charlie Kirk's death can potentially serve as an invitation to reintroduce the teachings of Jesus, which focus on love and fellowship instead of politics. Just as his life invited many to reconsider their beliefs, perhaps his death can catalyze broader spiritual revival. Final Thoughts on Faith in Society As believers and skeptics alike wade through these turbulent waters, the essential thing remains: faith is not simply about ideology but about a genuine relationship with God and community. We ought to invite those with diverse experiences and motivations to explore this relationship without judgment. Whether it’s a newfound desire for collective worship or an epiphany of personal belief, the journey toward understanding can often yield the most profound transformations. If you’re navigating these feelings, don’t hesitate to explore and engage with your local faith community. Attending a service can be your first step toward transformation. Remember, wherever you are in your faith journey, you are not alone.

09.14.2025

Was Charlie Kirk a Monster? Navigating Moral Leadership in Today’s Context

Update Examining the Character of Charlie Kirk: A Complex Figure In light of recent criticisms surrounding Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator and founder of Turning Point USA, it is vital to navigate the perceptions of morality and leadership. The question, "Was Charlie Kirk a monster?" was posed in a recent video and has sparked significant debate among believers, skeptics, and cultural critics alike. Through an analysis of Kirk's rhetoric and actions, we can glean insights that are pertinent not only for his supporters but for a broader audience seeking to understand ethical leadership in today's tumultuous climate.In 'Was Charlie Kirk a Monster? [Examining the Criticisms]', the discussion dives into the complexities of Kirk’s character and the implications of his impact on society, prompting a deeper analysis on our end. Articulating the Criticisms: What Are They? Critics of Kirk allege he fosters division and promotes controversial viewpoints. Accusations often include misrepresentation of facts or extremist tendencies regarding social issues. These charges merit a careful examination, as they explore how one's voice may influence younger generations, particularly within college settings. Understanding these criticisms is crucial for parents and educators who shape the next generation of thinkers. Why Understanding This Discussion Matters The ongoing debate surrounding Kirk's character is not simply a matter of public opinion; it reflects deeper social engagements that resonate within communities of faith. For believers strengthening their faith, understanding the implications of such dialogues can provide a framework for discussing moral integrity and the leanings of influential figures. Skeptics can investigate whether Kirk's assertions contradict established values or promote a harmful narrative. Counterarguments: The Other Side of the Coin Supporters of Kirk argue that his intentions are rooted in fostering open discussions surrounding free speech and conservative values in academia. They assert that his directness challenges the status quo and encourages youth to embrace their beliefs boldly. This perspective is particularly appealing to those in positions of influence—parents and ministry workers—who may find value in fostering independent thought among the younger generation. Future Implications: Where Does This Lead Us? As we look to the future, the ongoing scrutiny of figures like Charlie Kirk begs the question: what does ethical leadership look like in our time? Are we witnessing a shift in how leaders are held accountable for their influence? Engaging with these crucial conversations is vital for fostering a culture that encourages positive dialogue rather than perpetual division. For church leaders, understanding these dynamics can influence the teachings delivered in communities. Practical Insights for Navigating Complex Discussions One take away from evaluating Kirk's criticisms is the need for discernment in our communities. Here are some actionable insights for parents, educators, and church leaders: Encourage Critical Thinking: Teach youth to analyze the messages they consume critically. Where does the information source stem from? What are the underlying motivations? Foster Open Dialogue: Create environments where challenging discussions can occur without animosity. This can help bridge divides and foster an understanding of different viewpoints. Model Moral Integrity: As role models, adults must embody the ethical principles they wish to instill in the youth, demonstrating the importance of character in leadership. Conclusion: Taking Command of the Narrative Understanding the complexities surrounding Charlie Kirk’s persona and the criticisms he faces demands a combined effort from all members of the community. As epistolarians of faith and culture alike, we should engage wisely—promoting investigation rather than hostility. By doing so, we create spaces that invite young minds into the conversation of their values and beliefs. As believers and skeptics alike explore these themes, let’s remember the significance of community discourse. Engaging with diverse perspectives enhances our capacities to lead and teach in this evolving landscape. Share this article with others in your network to promote reflective conversations around leadership and accountability.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*