Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update

Biblical Living Unlocked

Logo - Biblical living unlocked
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Biblical Parenting
    • Parenting Tips
    • Family Fellowship
    • Bible Teaching
    • Apologetics
    • Community Stories
    • Youth Focus
    • International
    • Walton Evangelical Church
    • Salt Church Mar Menor
    • Salt Church Los Montesinos
    • John Piper
    • News & Offers
Add Element
  • Ken on Facebook
    update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
4 Minutes Read

The Real History of Penal Substitutionary Atonement

How Does Jesus Save Us? Understanding Penal Substitutionary Atonement

By Mike Winger, Simplified and Explained


Introduction: What Did Jesus Do on the Cross?

At the very heart of Christianity is a big question: how does Jesus save us? One way Christians have explained this is through something called Penal Substitutionary Atonement (PSA). That’s a mouthful, but it simply means this:

Jesus took our punishment so we could be forgiven and brought back to God.

This idea is not new. It’s been around since the early days of the Church and is taught clearly in the Bible.

What Does Penal Substitutionary Atonement Mean?

Let’s break it down into three simple parts:

• Penal – This comes from the word penalty. Because of sin, humans deserve a penalty. The Bible says, “The soul that sins shall die” (Ezekiel 18:20). Sin leads to separation from God and death.

• Substitutionary – This means Jesus took our place. He didn’t just die – He died for us. Like it says in Isaiah 53:5, “He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities.”

• Atonement – Atonement means to make things right between us and God. Through Jesus’s sacrifice, we are forgiven and made right with God (Romans 5:10).

So, put together: Jesus took the punishment we deserve (penal), in our place (substitution), to bring us back to God (atonement).

Why Do Some People Disagree?

Some modern teachers say PSA is a new idea that started only 500 years ago with a man named John Calvin. They argue that the early church didn’t believe this, and that PSA is based on legal thinking, not love.

But Pastor Mike Winger strongly disagrees. He believes that many early church leaders clearly taught that Jesus took the punishment for our sins.

Let’s look at what some of them said.

What Did Early Christians Believe?

Clement of Rome (c. 95 AD)

“Jesus Christ our Lord gave his blood for us… his body for our bodies, and his soul for our souls.”

This clearly shows substitution – Jesus gave Himself in our place.

Ignatius (c. 107 AD)

“He suffered all these things for our sakes that we might be saved.”

Jesus suffered so that we could be saved – that’s penalty and substitution.

Epistle of Barnabas (c. 70–135 AD)

This early Christian writing quotes Isaiah 53, which talks about the suffering servant taking the punishment for others’ sins.

“He was wounded for our transgressions… and with His stripes we are healed.”

The Epistle to Diognetus (2nd century)

“The righteous one for the unrighteous… Oh sweet exchange!”

This describes the beautiful exchange – Jesus took our place so we could be free.

Justin Martyr (c. 100–165 AD)

“The Father… wished his Christ to take upon himself the curses of all.”

Jesus took on the curse (the penalty) so we could be forgiven.


Isn’t There Another View? What About Christus Victor?

Yes, another way people understand the cross is called Christus Victor, which means “Christ the Victor.” This view says that Jesus defeated sin, death, and the devil.

But here’s the thing: Christus Victor and Penal Substitution are not enemies. They go hand in hand.

• PSA explains how Jesus won the victory (by taking our place).

• Christus Victor explains what the result was (Jesus defeated sin and death).

As Pastor Mike says, “They are sisters, not rivals.”


Does the Bible Support PSA?

Absolutely. The Bible is full of verses that teach penal substitution. Here are a few:

• Isaiah 53:5–6 – “The punishment that brought us peace was on him… the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all.”

• 2 Corinthians 5:21 – “God made him who had no sin to be sin for us.”

• Galatians 3:13 – “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us.”

• 1 Peter 2:24 – “He himself bore our sins in his body on the cross.”

These verses clearly show Jesus took our punishment to make us right with God.


Was God Angry at Jesus?

Some people say PSA makes it sound like God was cruel – even calling it “cosmic child abuse.” But this is a misunderstanding.

Here’s the truth: God was not punishing someone else. God Himself – in the person of Jesus – came to take our place. Jesus said, “No one takes my life from me, but I lay it down of my own accord” (John 10:18).

So, Jesus wasn’t a victim. He willingly gave Himself to save us. “But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8).


Conclusion: Why It Matters

Penal Substitutionary Atonement shows us two important things:

1. God is holy and just – He does not ignore sin.

2. God is loving and merciful – He took the punishment Himself so we could be saved.

This isn’t a cold, legal idea. It’s the glorious good news of the gospel. It’s about how Jesus saves us by giving His life for ours.


Final Thought

If you ever doubt how much God loves you, just look at the cross. As it says in Isaiah 53:10, “Yet it was the Lord’s will to crush him and cause him to suffer… and the will of the Lord will prosper in his hand.”

God was pleased – not because of the pain – but because Jesus’s death would bring salvation, healing, and new life to anyone who believes.


That’s the heart of Christianity. And that’s why the cross changes everything.


Apologetics

19 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
02.22.2026

Understanding What It Means to Be 'On Fire' for Jesus

Update Understanding the Fire of Faith: A Deeper Dive In the heart of Christian spirituality, the phrase "on fire for Jesus" often evokes images of fervent worship, passionate ministry, and an all-encompassing zeal for sharing the Gospel. This concept, while inspiring, can be complex and sometimes misunderstood. In our exploration of the idea, we aim to demystify what it truly means to be on fire for Jesus, examining both the authentic expressions of faith and the potential pitfalls that come with an unbridled zeal.In 'The TRUTH about being "on fire" for Jesus', the discussion dives into the complexities of passionate faith, exploring key insights that sparked deeper analysis on our end. A Historical Context of Zeal in Christianity To grasp the depth of being "on fire" for Jesus, it is essential to consider the historical context of zeal in Christianity. From the disciples of Jesus who spread His message across the known world to the early Church fathers who risked persecution, this intense passion is a hallmark of Christian history. One particularly notable example is the Apostle Paul, whose fervor in preaching, teaching, and defending the faith led to the founding of multiple churches despite facing tremendous opposition. However, this zeal often requires balance. The historical narratives reveal that while fiery passion is commendable, it can lead to misguided actions if not anchored in love and true understanding of Scripture. The historical journey of the church shows us both the glory and the caution we must take when interpreting zealousness. The Social Connection: Why Passion Matters The concept of being on fire for Jesus is not merely a personal experience; it has deep social implications. For believers, this passion can forge meaningful connections with others, serve as a source of inspiration, and create a shared sense of purpose within congregations. When Christians embody a passionate faith, they often encourage others to seek purpose in their spiritual journeys and foster a community of encouragement. On the flip side, skeptics often perceive this fervor with suspicion. Youth and college students, who navigate a landscape filled with diverse beliefs, may view intense displays of faith as either invigorating or alienating. Understanding the social dynamics at play can help shape how believers communicate their passion, ensuring that their enthusiasm invites others into dialogue rather than pushing them away. Future Insights: The Role of Passion in Modern Ministry As we look to the future, the role of passionate ministry is poised to evolve. In an era where culture is increasingly skeptical of organized religion, the challenge for church leaders and ministry workers is to harness authentic passion in ways that resonate with contemporary audiences. The key will be to balance the fire of passion with the wisdom of approach. For instance, rather than simply declaring the gospel from the pulpit, churches might focus on community engagement, allow for open discussions about faith, and demonstrate genuine love through actions. In doing so, they can cultivate a vibrant faith that is attractive to seekers and skeptics alike. Counterarguments: Exploring Diverse Perspectives While being on fire for Jesus is celebrated, it is also met with counterarguments. Some critics argue that excessive zeal can lead to legalism, exclusivity, or a judgmental attitude toward others. These concerns highlight the importance of tempering one's passion with humility and empathy. Engaging with differing perspectives opens the door for a more enriched understanding of faith that can coexist within a diverse world. Addressing these counterarguments does not diminish the genuine passion believers can feel but underscores the need for self-awareness and accountability within communities of faith. Practical Insights: Cultivating a Balanced Faith A key takeaway for believers is the importance of cultivating passion through spiritual disciplines such as prayer, study, and fellowship. These practices can ground passionate faith in the truths of Scripture, ensuring that expressions of zeal remain Christ-centered. Setting personal boundaries and being mindful of one's emotional health is also crucial. Recognizing when passion begins to border on burnout allows believers to recalibrate their focus and maintain a sustainable faith journey. Furthermore, sharing one's spiritual struggles in a community setting can encourage dialogue and offer support to others navigating similar challenges. Inspirational Thoughts: With Great Passion Comes Great Responsibility Ultimately, being on fire for Jesus carries great responsibility. Believers are called to embody love, patience, and understanding in their interactions with others, using their zeal to inspire rather than alienate. This commitment reflects the core of Jesus' teachings: to love one another and to offer grace continuously. As we navigate the complexities of faith, let us strive to ensure that our passion mirrors Christ’s love while inviting others into genuine conversations rather than into fanaticism. Final Thoughts: Keeping the Flame Alive In summary, the journey of understanding what it means to be "on fire" for Jesus is both enriching and challenging. For believers, this journey is an invitation to grow deeper in faith, cultivate meaningful relationships, and embody the love of Christ in pragmatic ways. For skeptics and seekers, it represents an opportunity for dialogue and mutual exploration of faith. The question remains: how can you keep the flame of spiritual passion alive in your own life and community? Let's embark on this journey together, inviting everyone, regardless of their beliefs, to consider what it means to be truly alive in faith.

02.21.2026

In John Piper's Lame Remarks, What Can We Learn About Leadership?

Update Why Public Statements Matter in Today's Church When a major church leader makes a public statement, the repercussions can ripple through congregations and communities alike. Recently, John Piper sparked a wave of conversation with a comment many deemed lackluster. This incident prompts an essential exploration into the weight of public discourse within the church, particularly in the current climate where clear guidance is not just preferred but expected.We came across 'He FINALLY said something! It was lame,' which covers John Piper's remarks on church leadership, and it raised some compelling points that we’re expanding on in this article. Understanding the Impact of Leadership Communication In the realm of theological discourse, leaders are not just speaking figures; they are shepherds guiding their flocks. When leaders of significant influence make statements, how they resonate with their audience is vital. This dynamic was evident when Piper's remarks evoked mixed responses, leading many to wonder about the effectiveness of his leadership. Are leaders being held to a higher standard when it comes to articulating doctrinal stances? Understanding the nuances of effective communication can shed light on congregational expectations. Theological Relevance: A Double-Edged Sword The balance of clarity and depth in biblical preaching is often a tightrope act that leads to misunderstandings. Observers noted that Piper’s ambiguous statement may have not engaged more profound theological discourse, and this becomes an important teaching moment. As Christians, we are called to discern messages based on biblical truth. Thus, why do we expect leaders to simplify complex issues into digestible segments, and how does this shape our approach to faith? Engagement and Expectation in the Contemporary Church In today’s information age, where every word is scrutinized and easy to disseminate, expectations placed upon church leaders can be both a blessing and a curse. Churchgoers often crave a message that not only inspires but also addresses current affairs and personal crises. This leads to the question of whether public statements should strive to encapsulate scriptural truths, or if they are merely platforms to reassure and offer comfort. The engagement level from congregants to such statements can be telling about their spiritual maturity and understanding of biblical teachings. Comparative Examples in Church History Looking back, notable figures in church history have faced similar scrutiny. From Martin Luther's bold statements against the church’s malpractices to contemporary church leaders discussing contemporary issues, each moment reflects the idea that leaders are also human and capable of missteps. Understanding historical parallels can provide a better comprehension of how criticism shapes theological discourse, encouraging growth and refinement within church leadership. Emotional Connection: What Goes Awry in Communication For many listeners, their emotional connection to a leader can dictate how they receive messages. Disappointment in a statement’s content often leads to discontent—not just with the leader, but with the church as a whole. People often expect their leaders to reflect their values and be articulate in their beliefs. When a leader misses the mark, it can cause a rift in the bond between them and the congregation. However, this tension can also spur deeper discussions about faith and expectation. Actionable Insights: What Can We Learn? As members of the church, we are called to hold our leaders accountable while also extending grace. It is essential to use moments like these to engage in active dialogue, fostering an atmosphere where leaders can grow from constructive feedback. Encouraging open discussions about faith and doctrine can cultivate an environment ripe for spiritual growth. In such dialogues, leaders can transform publicly perceived failures into opportunities for deeper engagement with their congregations. Moving Forward with Intentional Communication As we navigate our faith journeys, understanding the weight of words in our communities becomes essential. Church leaders should strive for clarity, depth, and authenticity in their teachings, while congregants should embrace their role in nurturance and critique. In light of Piper's comments, the real question moving forward becomes not just about expectations but also about how we can all foster an environment for thoughtful reflection and robust faith development. If you're passionate about ensuring that leaders articulate biblical truths with care and precision, consider hosting discussions in your community about the role of communication in faith. Engaging with one another can create space for shared learning and grow theological understanding among us all.

02.20.2026

The Controversial Dog Comment: An Insight into Public Discourse

Update The Controversy: What Happened? In a recent viral moment, a congressman sparked outrage when he appeared to favor a dog over expressing sympathy for the struggles faced by Muslim communities. This statement ignited a heated debate across social media platforms, raising questions about the values we hold and the discussions we surround ourselves with in today's society.In 'Congressman Chooses Dogs Over Muslims? (Internet Erupts)', the discussion delves into public discourse and empathy, prompting a deeper analysis of cultural critiques and the importance of understanding marginalized communities. Context Terms: Understanding the Background To effectively dissect this event, one must appreciate the historical context surrounding both the treatment of dogs in various cultures and the increasing pressures faced by Muslim communities in America and abroad. Many perceive Islamophobia as an escalating issue, particularly in a post-9/11 world where discriminatory rhetoric against Muslims often flares up. Delving deeper into this context allows us to understand why such comments can provoke intense emotional reactions. The Emotional Impact: Why It Matters For many members of the Muslim community, remarks that minimize their experiences can feel extremely invalidating. Moreover, those who perceive this incident through the lens of empathy for marginalized groups may find it distressing that a public figure would prioritize the sentimentality toward pets over the real struggles faced by humans. This sharp juxtaposition has sparked a broader discussion on empathy in politics and public discourse. Cultural Critique: The Role of Social Media in Modern Discourse The incident offers an opportunity to analyze how social media influences public reaction. With the rapid dissemination of information, platform dynamics can amplify controversies and foster divisive narratives. This occurrence showcases the necessity of responsible communication in an age where voices can be misinterpreted or used for political gain. As cultural critics, we must ponder how our discourses reflect societal values and how we can evolve beyond inflammatory rhetoric. What Can We Learn? Practical Insights for Parents and Educators From this event emerges an opportunity to educate the next generation on the importance of empathy and understanding different perspectives. Parents and educators can leverage this scenario to discuss empathy's role in our societies, the significance of historical context, and the potential consequences of our words and actions. By engaging youth on these topics now, they can grow to become compassionate leaders who value inclusivity. Actionable Steps: Moving Forward with Purpose As we navigate discussions about sensitive topics, it’s crucial to remember the power of language. Consider adopting communication strategies that emphasize mutual respect and understanding. This involves listening before reacting, educating oneself about differing cultures, and fostering environments where open conversations about perceived injustices can thrive. Encouragement for Reflection and Action Each of us has a role to play in shaping our communities and discourse. Whether you are a believer, a skeptic, or simply seeking to learn, engage with these discussions meaningfully. Compassionate discourse can bridge the divide in our society and cultivate an atmosphere of understanding. As we reflect on the uproar generated by the congressman's comment, let's push for a society where discussions are steeped in empathy and framed within historical realities. It’s our responsibility to continuously challenge ourselves and each other to engage in conversations that uplift—rather than diminish—our shared humanity. If this topic resonates with you, consider exploring more resources that delve into the necessity of understanding and empathizing with communities beyond your own. Together, we can build a more inclusive conversation, one that not only recognizes differing experiences but thrives on them.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*